2019
DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.00749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Hypothesis for the Role of Photosynthetic Physiology in Shaping Macroevolutionary Patterns

Abstract: ORCID IDs: 0000-0003-0317-9563 (C.Y.); 0000-0002-7893-1142 (J.C.M.).The fossil record and models of atmospheric concentrations of O 2 and CO 2 suggest that past shifts in plant ecological dominance often coincided with dramatic changes in Earth's atmospheric composition. This study tested the effects of past changes in atmospheric composition on the photosynthetic physiology of a limited range of early-diverging angiosperms (eight), gymnosperms (three), and ferns (two). We performed physiological measurements … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(139 reference statements)
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again here, gymnosperms behave somewhat as outliers as, being the group with the largest WUE – although not differing statistically from pteridophytes and angiosperms (Figure a) – present the lowest g m / g s compared with pteridophytes and angiosperms (Figure a) but the highest ETR/ g s , although similar to those in pteridophytes (Figure b). These observations for gymnosperms are fully in agreement with a recent independent study by Yiotis and McElwain () and suggest that the ratio ETR/ g s (or V c,max / g s ) is a much more ‘powerful means’ to improve WUE than g m / g s . However, for not yet fully understood reasons with the exception of gymnosperms, the g m / g s ratio seems to have had a predominant role in establishing the phylogenetic differences for WUE.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Capacity and Photosynthetic Efficiencies Alonsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Again here, gymnosperms behave somewhat as outliers as, being the group with the largest WUE – although not differing statistically from pteridophytes and angiosperms (Figure a) – present the lowest g m / g s compared with pteridophytes and angiosperms (Figure a) but the highest ETR/ g s , although similar to those in pteridophytes (Figure b). These observations for gymnosperms are fully in agreement with a recent independent study by Yiotis and McElwain () and suggest that the ratio ETR/ g s (or V c,max / g s ) is a much more ‘powerful means’ to improve WUE than g m / g s . However, for not yet fully understood reasons with the exception of gymnosperms, the g m / g s ratio seems to have had a predominant role in establishing the phylogenetic differences for WUE.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Capacity and Photosynthetic Efficiencies Alonsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…angiosperms (Figure 5a) but the highest ETR/g s , although similar to those in pteridophytes (Figure 5b). These observations for gymnosperms are fully in agreement with a recent independent study by Yiotis and McElwain (2019) and suggest that the ratio ETR/g s (or V c,max /g s ) is a much more 'powerful means' to improve WUE than g m /g s . However, for not yet fully understood reasons with the exception of gymnosperms, the g m /g s ratio seems to have had a predominant role in establishing the phylogenetic differences for WUE.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Capacity and Photosynthetic Efficiencies Alonsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High LMA generally occurs in woody evergreens because of their robust leaf structure, which can incur resistance to CO 2 diffusion and, hence, lower mesophyll conductance ( g m ) ( 7 , 15 , 16 ). Therefore, evergreen leaves, in general, are likely to operate at lower g m values than deciduous leaves ( 16 , 17 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there are still large uncertainties in the values for g m (von Caemmerer & Evans, 2015) and the ratio of g m to g s . Many studies have assumed constant value for g m / g s across plant species (Flanagan & Farquhar, 2014; Wang et al., 2017; Warren, 2008; Warren & Dreyer, 2006), while others have reported variations in g m values between the two major groups of seed plants, with higher g m / g s in angiosperms than in gymnosperms (Flexas & Carriqui, 2020; Yiotis & McElwain, 2019). The magnitude of the offset in g m / g s values between plant groups is, however, still unclear, but very likely is in the range of 25%–50%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%