2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Hybrid Technique in the Treatment of Dystrophic Scoliosis Secondary to Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Lacking Pedicles in the Apical Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preoperative continuous cervical traction could correct cervical kyphosis to a certain extent, release the muscles around the cervical spine and facet joints, provide a wider operating space for the anterior approach, and reduce the surgical risk and difficulty 19–21 . In cases of NF‐1‐associated kyphosis, less traction is usually indicated due to the fragility of the dystrophic cervical spine 22 . In our study, 7 cases of fixed cervical kyphosis were treated with cervical skull traction, and the traction weight was maintained at 6–10 kg for a total duration of 1–3 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Preoperative continuous cervical traction could correct cervical kyphosis to a certain extent, release the muscles around the cervical spine and facet joints, provide a wider operating space for the anterior approach, and reduce the surgical risk and difficulty 19–21 . In cases of NF‐1‐associated kyphosis, less traction is usually indicated due to the fragility of the dystrophic cervical spine 22 . In our study, 7 cases of fixed cervical kyphosis were treated with cervical skull traction, and the traction weight was maintained at 6–10 kg for a total duration of 1–3 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JOA scores were improved from 10.42 (range, 8-16) preoperatively to 15.25 (range, 11-18) at final follow-up (p < 0.01). NDI scores were decreased from an average of 23.25 (range, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] preoperatively to an average of 7.08 (range, 3-15) at the final follow-up ( p < 0.01). Patients had achieved effective pain relief at the final follow-up with an average of 1.42 ( p < 0.01) (Table 5).…”
Section: Clinical Measurement and Functional Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation