2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2018.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel hybrid priority discipline for multi-class secondary users in cognitive radio networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the increasing number of data types in realworld communication networks, many researchers introduced graded cognitive users into CRNs to ensure the QoS of SUs. Just as described in [14,15], this grading mechanism can improve system performance of CRNs effectively. In [16], Tumuluru et al divided the SUs into two classes with different priorities and studied the spectrum switching priorities in the centralized and distributed CRN architectures by using a novel dynamic SAS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the increasing number of data types in realworld communication networks, many researchers introduced graded cognitive users into CRNs to ensure the QoS of SUs. Just as described in [14,15], this grading mechanism can improve system performance of CRNs effectively. In [16], Tumuluru et al divided the SUs into two classes with different priorities and studied the spectrum switching priorities in the centralized and distributed CRN architectures by using a novel dynamic SAS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlling the preemption behavior is another way to ensure the transmission continuity of SUs. In [15], considering hierarchical SUs, a service principle combining preemption and nonpreemption was proposed. When the number of interruptions of low-level SUs reached the threshold, the high-level SUs would no longer preempt the low-level SUs, while the PUs could always preempt any kind of SUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-emption and non-preemption priorities attracted many attentions in the previous works. In this topic, we will investigate the authors' contributions in [16][17][18]. A hybrid approach is exposed in [16], at which low priority SUs are no longer pre-empted by high priority SUs, when their number of interruptions reaches a certain threshold value.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this topic, we will investigate the authors' contributions in [16][17][18]. A hybrid approach is exposed in [16], at which low priority SUs are no longer pre-empted by high priority SUs, when their number of interruptions reaches a certain threshold value. Therefore, the authors showed that the threshold adjustment according to the performance metric provided a promising performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%