“…Over the last couple decades, inversion methods of estimating refractivity from radar measurements have become increasingly prominent (Karimian et al., 2011). Inversion methods using measured sea clutter data (referred to as RFC approaches) have been examined extensively (Compaleo et al., 2018; Gerstoft et al., 2003; Karimian et al., 2013; Rogers et al., 2000, 2005; Tepecik & Navruz, 2018; Yardim et al., 2009; Zhao & Huang, 2012; Zhao et al., 2017), but few studies demonstrate inversion methods using point‐to‐point (PTP) radar wave propagation data. Of those studies, most have demonstrated the validity of inverse approaches using synthetic propagation loss (PL) data (Fountoulakis & Earls, 2016; Gersoft et al., 2000; Gingras et al., 1997; Matsko & Hackett, 2019; Penton & Hackett, 2018; Tabrikian & Krolik, 1999; Wagner et al., 2016; Zhang & Yang, 2018; Zhang et al., 2016; Zhao, 2012; Zhao et al., 2011).…”