2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.137851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel H2O2photoelectrochemical sensor based on ternary RGO/Ag-TiO2 nanotube arrays nanocomposite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure a, V 2 (Co x Sn 1‑ x )C has the greatest electrocatalytic OER activity on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) with the lowest overpotential of 323 mV to drive a current density of 3 mA cm –2 , outperforming the V 2 (Fe x Sn 1‑ x )­C, V 2 (Ni x Sn 1‑ x )­C, V 2 (Mn x Sn 1‑ x )­C, V 2 SnC, and the typical electrodeposited Co–H catalyst. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (Figure b) further shows that inserting Co into A sites in V 2 (A x Sn 1‑ x )C MAX phases results in a substantially smaller arc than incorporating other transition metals (Ni, Fe, Mn), demonstrating that the OER electrical conductivity for V 2 (A x Sn 1‑ x )C can be controlled by incorporating a different element in A sites . Furthermore, we also fitted and compared the differences in charge-transfer resistance ( R ct ) for V 2 (Co x Sn 1‑ x )C and Co–H.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure a, V 2 (Co x Sn 1‑ x )C has the greatest electrocatalytic OER activity on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) with the lowest overpotential of 323 mV to drive a current density of 3 mA cm –2 , outperforming the V 2 (Fe x Sn 1‑ x )­C, V 2 (Ni x Sn 1‑ x )­C, V 2 (Mn x Sn 1‑ x )­C, V 2 SnC, and the typical electrodeposited Co–H catalyst. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (Figure b) further shows that inserting Co into A sites in V 2 (A x Sn 1‑ x )C MAX phases results in a substantially smaller arc than incorporating other transition metals (Ni, Fe, Mn), demonstrating that the OER electrical conductivity for V 2 (A x Sn 1‑ x )C can be controlled by incorporating a different element in A sites . Furthermore, we also fitted and compared the differences in charge-transfer resistance ( R ct ) for V 2 (Co x Sn 1‑ x )C and Co–H.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (Figure 2b) further shows that inserting Co into A sites in V 2 (A x Sn 1-x )C MAX phases results in a substantially smaller arc than incorporating other transition metals (Ni, Fe, Mn), demonstrating that the OER electrical conductivity for V 2 (A x Sn 1-x )C can be controlled by incorporating a different element in A sites. 28 Furthermore, we also fitted and compared the differences in charge-transfer resistance (R ct ) for V 2 (Co x Sn 1-x )C and Co−H. Table S1 summarizes the parameter values of equivalent electrical circuits, where R s denotes the solution resistance, R el denotes the electrode resistance, and CPE is the constant phase element, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding equivalent electrical circuit and fitting parameters are presented in Figure b and Table S3, respectively, where R ct signifies the charge transfer resistance at the electrode/electrolyte interface, R sc represents the space charge layer resistance at the space charge layer near the surface of electrodes, and R s and CPE are the solution resistance and constant phase element representing the pseudocapacitive behavior of each interface/EC process, respectively. The smaller arc radius means smaller resistance and higher charge transfer efficiency. Here, the α-SnWO 4 /CoO x photoanode ( R ct + R sc = 3.0 kΩ) possesses better photogenerated charge transport kinetics than the pristine α-SnWO 4 film ( R ct + R sc = 9.1 kΩ). The corresponding Bode plots (Figure S22) also consistently show this improvement of charge transport kinetics between samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) is a widely studied photosensitive material owing to its favorable photoelectric properties, natural abundance, high photocorrosion resilience, and excellent biocompatibility. The photoelectric performance of TiO 2 can be enhanced by altering its structure; for example, TiO 2 nanotube arrays (NTAs) display an enhanced electron transportation rate and PEC performance attributed to the dense pattern of aligned nanotubes and intimate contact with the Ti foil substrate. , However, the PEC application of intrinsic TiO 2 NTA is hindered by its wide band gap and rapid electron–hole recombination. The PEC efficiency of TiO 2 NTA can be improved through forming heterostructures with organic nanomaterials with narrow band gaps. Gao et al constructed a γ-graphyne/TiO 2 NTA heterojunction using a facile drop-coating method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12−15 The photoelectric performance of TiO 2 can be enhanced by altering its structure; for example, TiO 2 nanotube arrays (NTAs) display an enhanced electron transportation rate and PEC performance attributed to the dense pattern of aligned nanotubes and intimate contact with the Ti foil substrate. 16,17 However, the PEC application of intrinsic TiO 2 NTA is hindered by its wide band gap and rapid electron−hole recombination. The PEC efficiency of TiO 2 NTA can be improved through forming heterostructures with organic nanomaterials with narrow band gaps.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%