2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-020-01842-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel ghost cell boundary model for the explicit moving particle simulation method in two dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, along with new improvements in MPS method, it has also been extended to many new applications including the two-phase flow simulation. [36][37][38][39] In terms of fluid flow description, the flow interface can be obtained more clearly and smoother by the SPH method than those obtained by original MPS method. 40,41 Therefore, many scholars have proposed high-precision methods such as the multiphase MPS method, the IMPS method, and the least squares MPS method for shortcoming of the MPS method, and have made advanced progress in the stability of the two-phase flow simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, along with new improvements in MPS method, it has also been extended to many new applications including the two-phase flow simulation. [36][37][38][39] In terms of fluid flow description, the flow interface can be obtained more clearly and smoother by the SPH method than those obtained by original MPS method. 40,41 Therefore, many scholars have proposed high-precision methods such as the multiphase MPS method, the IMPS method, and the least squares MPS method for shortcoming of the MPS method, and have made advanced progress in the stability of the two-phase flow simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPS method was first proposed by Koshizuka et al 35 and was initially developed for the simulation of incompressible fluid flow. Recently, along with new improvements in MPS method, it has also been extended to many new applications including the two‐phase flow simulation 36–39 . In terms of fluid flow description, the flow interface can be obtained more clearly and smoother by the SPH method than those obtained by original MPS method 40,41 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, problems in the simulation of Lagrange particles remain: the poor particle approximation accuracy near the boundaries is attributed to an inconsistent boundary treatment and incompleteness of particle support domains. [37][38][39] To achieve higher-order mapping accuracy and high-resolution shock capturing, a novel coupled Euler-Lagrange method is proposed to simulate compressible fluids with large deformation. The CELM can not only solve the Lagrange grid distortion problem but can also resolve the accuracy defects of the Euler method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al 36 introduced a hybrid Lagrange–Euler topology optimization method to transmit the density information from the movable Lagrange particles to the fixed Euler grid; therefore, the method can help realize the multi‐density resolution of the complex structure at a lower computational cost. However, problems in the simulation of Lagrange particles remain: the poor particle approximation accuracy near the boundaries is attributed to an inconsistent boundary treatment and incompleteness of particle support domains 37–39 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples for the recent application of Lagrangian particle methods such as smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and moving particle simulations (MPS) for free-surface-flow simulations are given by Zheng et al (2020) and Ni et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%