2018
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s176260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel gene-pair signature for relapse-free survival prediction in colon cancer

Abstract: BackgroundColon cancer (CC) patients with early relapse usually have a poor prognosis. In this study, we aimed to identify a novel signature to improve the prediction of relapse-free survival (RFS) in CC.MethodsFour microarray datasets were merged into a training set (n=1,045), and one RNA-sequencing dataset was used as a validation set (n=384). In the training set, microarray meta-analysis screened out 596 common RFS-related genes across datasets, which were used to construct 177,310 gene pairs. Then, the LAS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent advances in high-throughput gene testing technology have provided an opportunity to define the genetic landscape of colon cancer and led to the development of many molecular signatures for prognosis prediction and personalisation of treatment paradigms [[8], [9], [10], [11]]. However, some of these signatures were frequently ill-defined, having been generated from unspecified genetic backgrounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in high-throughput gene testing technology have provided an opportunity to define the genetic landscape of colon cancer and led to the development of many molecular signatures for prognosis prediction and personalisation of treatment paradigms [[8], [9], [10], [11]]. However, some of these signatures were frequently ill-defined, having been generated from unspecified genetic backgrounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROC curve analysis indicated that this 5-mRNA signature panel can accurately predict the prognosis for patients with RC, with the AUC of 0.915 and 0.827 for the training and validation datasets, respectively. The prognostic performance of our risk score seemed to be better than that of previously reported signature panels developed for CRC (such as 4 genes: AUC = 0.722 for the external dataset and 0.607 for the internal dataset [ 4 ]; 6 genes: AUC = 0.683 [ 7 ]; and 9 genes: AUC = 0.741 [ 23 ]) or CC (16 gene pairs: AUC = 0.724 [ 9 ]; 9 genes: AUC = 0.676 [ 22 ]). In addition, in the study of Zuo et al [ 7 ], they performed a subgroup analysis to confirm whether the 6-gene signature panel was effective for colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) and READ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Sun et al developed a 12-gene expression signature panel to precisely predict the prognosis for CC patients, which could distinguish poor from good prognosis patients within stage II/III [ 8 ]. Chen et al found that the signature panel consisting of 16 gene pairs formed by 24 genes had a better prognostic ability than the TNM stage (AUC: 0.724 vs. 0.703; concordance index (C-index): 0.869 vs. less than 0.8) at 5 years [ 9 ]. Although there were also studies to identify mRNAs associated with the prognosis of RC patients [ 10 13 ], no reports specifically focused on the signature panel and compared its prognostic values with clinical factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUC and c-index in the TCGA set and the other three independent sets were similar. Additionally, the method of gene pair was based on a relative ranking of gene expression level to make pairwise comparison and generate the score in the same patient, which could eliminate the shortcomings, such as the batch effect of different platforms 12,13,18 . www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Nowadays, emerging studies show the tumor microenvironment (TME) is critical for the initiation, progression, and metastasis of cancers, and therapy targeting the TME seems to be an encouraging method to overthrow therapeutic escape issues 19,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%