2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-03997-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel fuzzy mechanism for risk assessment in software projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fan et al [91] used the extended DEMATEL method to identify IT outsourcing risk factors. Another study combined fuzzy DEMATEL with adaptive Neuro-fuzzy inference system-based multicriteria decision making (ANFIS MCDM) and intuitionistic fuzzy-based TODIM (IF-TODIM) approaches for better assessment of software project risks [92]. Asad et al [93] used a Grey-based DEMATEL method to study and model the flexibility capabilities in an IT-based supply chain.…”
Section: B Existing Models/framework Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (Ism) and Decision-making Trial And Evaluation Laboratory (Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fan et al [91] used the extended DEMATEL method to identify IT outsourcing risk factors. Another study combined fuzzy DEMATEL with adaptive Neuro-fuzzy inference system-based multicriteria decision making (ANFIS MCDM) and intuitionistic fuzzy-based TODIM (IF-TODIM) approaches for better assessment of software project risks [92]. Asad et al [93] used a Grey-based DEMATEL method to study and model the flexibility capabilities in an IT-based supply chain.…”
Section: B Existing Models/framework Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (Ism) and Decision-making Trial And Evaluation Laboratory (Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, through the defuzzificated process to transform FNs to the numerical value, and making decision. We combine the traditional MADM method and fuzzy theory to solve the problem of nurses' competency more appropriately (Büyüközkan and Göçer 2019;Suresh and Dillibabu 2020).…”
Section: Expert Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This graphic can simplify the complex causal relation into an easily understandable visual structure and therefore make us facilely conceive the idea of solving the problems. When ( ) i i DR  is positive and located above the x axis, the quality factor m belongs to the type of cause, but if ( ) i i DR  is negative and located below the x axis, the quality factor belongs to the type of result (Abdullah and Najib 2016;Suresh and Dillibabu 2020).…”
Section: (6) Causal Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…life cycle, 9 mitigate project risks, 10 and generally manage software project resources and quality. 4 Benchmarking software development is not a trivial process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%