2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel fractionation method prior to MS-based proteomics analysis using cascade biomimetic affinity chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using peptides with a probability (p) value greater than or equal to 95% as correct filtering conditions, the original LC/ MS datasets of rat-liver proteomics by Tan et al (Tan et al, 2009) identified 391 non-redundant proteins in unfractionated rat liver cytosol, 499 proteins in 2 fractions of the first layer affinity fractionation, 616 in 4 fractions of L2 fractionation, and 738 in 8 fractions of L3 fractionation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using peptides with a probability (p) value greater than or equal to 95% as correct filtering conditions, the original LC/ MS datasets of rat-liver proteomics by Tan et al (Tan et al, 2009) identified 391 non-redundant proteins in unfractionated rat liver cytosol, 499 proteins in 2 fractions of the first layer affinity fractionation, 616 in 4 fractions of L2 fractionation, and 738 in 8 fractions of L3 fractionation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Original LC/MS datasets of rat-liver proteomics were collected using cascade affinity fractionation and Trans-Proteomic Pipeline (TPP) software (Tan et al, 2009). Briefly, the cascade affinity fractionation was composed of different biomimetic affinity ligand columns with a diverse combination of characteristics for affinity fractionation at cascade level.…”
Section: Experimental Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To simplify the sample and increase the detection probability of middle-and low-abundance proteins, suitable high abundance protein depletion and prefractionation methods were often adopted prior to trypsin digestion (Bergh et al, 2003;Jacobs et al, 2004;Gao et al, 2006;Liu and Zhang, 2007;Gao et al, 2008). Affinity chromatography (AC) can be also used to reduce the complexity of the protein/peptide by selecting the specific target protein/peptide (Gygi et al, 1999;Pieper et al, 2003;Greenough et al, 2004, Tan et al,2009a,2009b& 2010. Traditional affinity adsorbents comprise natural biological ligands, which are expensive to produce, show low binding capacities, have limited life cycles, and low scale-up potential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%