2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel fMRI group data analysis method based on data-driven reference extracting from group subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BFNs extraction has been formulated as a source separation problem, based on the functional integration property of the brain (McKeown et al, 1998 ; Du and Fan, 2013 ; Shi et al, 2015a ). This source separation problem can usually be divided into blind source separation (BSS) and semi-blind source separation (SBSS), depending on whether the prior is given or not.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BFNs extraction has been formulated as a source separation problem, based on the functional integration property of the brain (McKeown et al, 1998 ; Du and Fan, 2013 ; Shi et al, 2015a ). This source separation problem can usually be divided into blind source separation (BSS) and semi-blind source separation (SBSS), depending on whether the prior is given or not.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth group analysis approach, makes a post-hoc analysis of the single-subject ICAs, to combine the components into groups by spatial correlation (Schöpf et al, 2010 ; Wang et al, 2012 ), self-organized clustering (Esposito et al, 2005 ), or retrospective matching of the components (Langers, 2010 ). Additionally, by incorporating the intragroup sources as a priori of ICA model, called ICA-R (ICA with references; Lu and Rajapakse, 2006 ; Shi et al, 2015a ), it is expected to obtain the more accurate subject-specific brain sources. For example, a novel group information guided ICA model (GIG-ICA) with the spatial reference of the intragroup sources generated by TCGICA (Calhoun et al, 2001 ) was able to extract more accurate subject-specific brain sources than the traditional ICA (Du and Fan, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon might be partly due to the different spatial distribution of the individual DMN, which is likely affected by diseases, and to the change in the spatial distribution results from the decreased and increased regional FC of the whole brain to the original healthy DMN, which might mutually offset. Therefore, though the single-subject ICA method is better to reflect current individual FC of the DMN (Anderson et al 2011, Shi et al 2015, Esposito et al 2005, this method might not be able to detect the influence of impaired regions of DMN and to diminish the effect of compensatory regions on the DMN (Damoiseaux et al 2012, Vemuri et al 2012, Seidler et al 2010. Instead, our method, using a DMN template from young and normal subjects to extract FC of the DMN for all subjects, is likely to solve this problem and truly demonstrate a much better clinical correlation than the single-subject ICA method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature review, this problem is mainly handled by clustering single-subject ICA results instead of performing group ICA, such as self-organizing clustering method, bagged clustering method, and group ICA with intrinsic reference, all of which avoid the required assumption of common functional networks across all subjects in group ICA. These methods reflect the individual functional network better and the resultant ICA components are more correlated with individual components than those from traditional group ICA (Anderson et al 2011, Shi et al 2015, Esposito et al 2005. Computing intra-network FC based on these methods may reflect individual network function, but the resultant RSNs are likely composed of partly different brain regions in different subjects and even more different in diseased subjects because the commonness of ICA components across subjects is not included in these new ICA methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology is one of the most significant approaches to obtain the data of neuroinformatics. It has been widely used in human behavior experiment and pathology because of its noninvasive, repeatability and other advantages [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. FMRI can be used to obtain high-resolution threedimensional images of the brain through the BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) effect, which can dynamically reflect changes in brain activity signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%