2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27378-1_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel FLVCR1 Variant Implicated in Retinitis Pigmentosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is notable the c.1022A>G (p.Tyr341Cys) variant is only the second disease-associated variant to be found in FLVCR1 associated with RP without posterior column degeneration [43]. Moreover, it is the first protein coding variant found in this gene to be affiliated with non-syndromic RP [45]. There were no extraocular features associated with this variant (Figure 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is notable the c.1022A>G (p.Tyr341Cys) variant is only the second disease-associated variant to be found in FLVCR1 associated with RP without posterior column degeneration [43]. Moreover, it is the first protein coding variant found in this gene to be affiliated with non-syndromic RP [45]. There were no extraocular features associated with this variant (Figure 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, variants in FLVCR1 have been associated with a neurological syndrome, posterior column ataxia with retinitis pigmentosa (PCARP; MIM: 609033) [39][40][41], and more recently a specific splice variant (c.1092 + 5G>A) has been reported multiple times to be associated with non-syndromic RP [42][43][44]. Through Target 5000, substantial evidence has been obtained that suggests the first incidence of a protein coding FLVCR1 variant c.1022A>G (p.Tyr341Cys) implicated in non-syndromic RP [45]. RP is the most common clinical diagnosis for participants in the Target 5000 study, where the clinical diagnosis of RP accounts for nearly 40% (379/1004) of total pedigrees enrolled to date (Figure 1).…”
Section: Flvcr1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our team has previously reported a pedigree in which five affected members of the family were broadly categorised as RP phenotypes. After genetic investigation it was revealed that four of these individuals were homozygous for a FLVCR1 variant, while the remaining affected patient was compound heterozygous for pathogenic variants in NR2E3 [ 84 ]. Similarly, in a US study, involving three IRD pedigrees, each given an initial diagnosis of RP, one with a dominant RP and the other two with a dominant, incompletely penetrant RP, it was found that multiple IRD genes were responsible for various affected individuals in each of the three families: both USH2A and RP1 was segregating in one family; PRPH2 and CRX in a second family and PRPH2 , PRPH8 and USH2A in the third family [ 85 ].…”
Section: Irds—target Panels and Whole Exome Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, nine reported cases with isolated RP carry the c.1092+5G>A splice site variant on at least one allele (Glöckle et al, 2014;Tiwari et al, 2016;Yusuf et al, 2018). The c.1022A>G variant was reported in a homozygous state in seven patients with isolated RP (Dockery et al, 2019). It has also been noted by Kuehlewein et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%