A Novel Flow-Diverting Device (Tubridge) for the Treatment of 28 Large or Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience

Zhou, Yu; Yang, Pengfei; Fang, Yibin; Xu, Yi; Hong, Bo; Zhao, Wenyuan; Li, Q.; Zhao, Rui; Huang, Qinghai; Liu, J.-M.

doi:10.3174/ajnr.a3925

Cited by 63 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The technical success rate, clinical outcome, and angiographic results are in line with the findings of comparable series. 1,[3][4][5][11][12][13] The device itself is being developed further, similar to modifications to the PED and NeuroEndoGraft.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Initial Experience with p64: A Novel Mechanically Detachable Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Intracranial Saccular Sidewall Aneurysms

Fischer

Aguilar-Pérez²,

Henkes³

et al. 2015

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Initial Experience with p64: A Novel Mechanically Detachable Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Intracranial Saccular Sidewall Aneurysms

Fischer

Aguilar-Pérez²,

Henkes³

et al. 2015

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tubridge flow diverters harbor a pore size of 0.040–0.050 mm 2 at the nominal diameter to provide high metal coverage (approximately 30.0–35.0%) at the aneurysmal neck after expansion. A complete occlusion rate for anterior circulation aneurysms treated with Tubridge stents after an average of 19.0 months of follow-up was 72%,8 and that for posterior circulation aneurysms at a median of 26.0 months of follow-up 83% 9…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Republished: Late recurrence of a completely occluded large intracranial aneurysm treated with a Tubridge flow diverter

Zhang

Wang

et al. 2016

J NeuroIntervent Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We report a rare case of recurrence of a large intracavernous aneurysm after angiography proved complete occlusion. The aneurysm was treated by a combination of a Tubridge flow diverter and coils, and balloon angioplasty, after flow diverter devices deployment for parent vessel stenosis. Six month angiographic follow-up demonstrated complete occlusion. Unfortunately, obvious aneurysm recurrence was confirmed on 2 year angiographic follow-up. The probable mechanism of recurrence was analyzed.

show abstract

“…[7] Preliminary evidence has demonstrated their safety and efficacy for treating complex aneurysms. [6] The Tubridge FD is a stent-like vessel-reconstruction devise designed with a high metal coverage rate and low porosity and was approved by the Ethics Committee of our institution and by the Chinese Lvis, and have shown that simulation can be useful during stent deployment. [12] Ospel et al supposed that simulated length of Pipeline calculated by software was shorter than the manually determined presumed optimal devices.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Software-based simulation for preprocedural assessment of Tubridge flow diverter sizing: a validation study

Li¹,

Obradó²,

Larrabide³

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The purpose of this single-center retrospective review was to validate the use of a software-based simulation of Tubridge flow diverter (FD) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. In a single-center cohort of 17 patients undergoing aneurysm treatment with the Tubridge flow divert, we analyzed their pre- and post-procedural angiographic studies to compare the manufacturer-given nominal length (NL), software calculated simulated length (SL), and the actual measured length (ML) of the flow divert using software. Results: Data for the 3 lengths of all 17 patients treated with Tubridge flow diverts were collected and analyzed in this study. Error discrepancy was calculated by mean squared error (ML to NL 10.64; SL to NL 9.95 p>0.05), mean absolute error (ML to NL 2.64; SL to NL 2.60 p>0.05), and mean error (NL to ML 1.26; SL to ML 2.59 p>0.05). Conclusions: The SL was usually greater than the NL given by the manufacturer, indicating significant change in length in most cases. The residual comparing the ML to the NL was significant, as was when comparing the SL to the NL. The assessment of the Tubridge flow diverter using software simulation is safe and effective and the accurate calculating of FD length contributed to the right-sized FD for optimal placement in intracranial vasculature.

show abstract

A Novel Flow-Diverting Device (Tubridge) for the Treatment of 28 Large or Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience

Cited by 63 publications

References 29 publications

Initial Experience with p64: A Novel Mechanically Detachable Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Intracranial Saccular Sidewall Aneurysms

Initial Experience with p64: A Novel Mechanically Detachable Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Intracranial Saccular Sidewall Aneurysms

Republished: Late recurrence of a completely occluded large intracranial aneurysm treated with a Tubridge flow diverter

Software-based simulation for preprocedural assessment of Tubridge flow diverter sizing: a validation study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About