2009
DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2009.9727661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Fast Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm for QoS Multicast Routing in MANET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also leads to excessive delay that affects the quality of service (QoS) for delay sensitive applications. 3 Routing protocols should adapt to these topology changes and continue to maintain connection between the source and destination nodes in the presence of path breaks caused by link and/or node failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also leads to excessive delay that affects the quality of service (QoS) for delay sensitive applications. 3 Routing protocols should adapt to these topology changes and continue to maintain connection between the source and destination nodes in the presence of path breaks caused by link and/or node failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As evolutionary algorithm (EA) can deal simultaneously with a set of possible solutions in a single run, it is especially suitable to solve MOO problems. Many evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms have been developed in the last few years, such as evolutionary computation, swarm intelligence [19][20][21]. As a new form of swarm intelligence, PSO has been used to solve MOO problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, evolutionary algorithms (EAs) [1][2][3][4][5] , such as genetic algorithms, evolutionary programming, and evolutionary strategies, have been successfully applied to real-world optimization problems. The main advantage of these algorithms, relative to most conventional optimization methods (e.g., Newton-based techniques, linear programming, and interior point methods) lies in that they do not apply mathematical assumptions to the optimization problems and have better global search capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%