2016
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel fast mass transfer anaerobic inner loop fluidized bed biofilm reactor for PTA wastewater treatment

Abstract: In this paper, a fast mass transfer anaerobic inner loop fluidized bed biofilm reactor (ILFBBR) was developed to improve purified terephthalic acid (PTA) wastewater treatment. The emphasis of this study was on the start-up mode of the anaerobic ILFBBR, the hydraulic loadings and the operation stability. The biological morphology of the anaerobic biofilm in the reactors was also analyzed. The anaerobic column could operate successfully for 46 days due to the pre-aerating process. The anaerobic column had the ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluidized-bed bioreactor (FBBR) has attracted significant attention as an alternative to the conventional suspended-growth wastewater-treatment processes because of its high-efficiency performance. Several advantages of FBBR compared with conventional wastewater-treatment processes, such as its higher biomass concentration, higher mass-transfer efficiency, lower hydraulic-retention time (HRT), and smaller footprint, have been discussed extensively in the literature. Compared with the conventional liquid–solid FBBR, the liquid–solid circulating-fluidized-bed bioreactor (CFBBR) has additional advantages . The liquid–solid CFBBR integrates two fluidized beds into one unit, and several biochemical processes can occur within a single system, with particle recirculation between the two fluidized beds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluidized-bed bioreactor (FBBR) has attracted significant attention as an alternative to the conventional suspended-growth wastewater-treatment processes because of its high-efficiency performance. Several advantages of FBBR compared with conventional wastewater-treatment processes, such as its higher biomass concentration, higher mass-transfer efficiency, lower hydraulic-retention time (HRT), and smaller footprint, have been discussed extensively in the literature. Compared with the conventional liquid–solid FBBR, the liquid–solid circulating-fluidized-bed bioreactor (CFBBR) has additional advantages . The liquid–solid CFBBR integrates two fluidized beds into one unit, and several biochemical processes can occur within a single system, with particle recirculation between the two fluidized beds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%