2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel experimental-theoretical method to improve MMP estimation using VIT technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MMP is an important parameter to judge the miscible state between injected gas and crude oil during gas flooding. Many methods can be used to determine the MMP of gas flooding, including the slim tube experiment, the interfacial tension test, EoS prediction and empirical formula calculation [25][26][27][28][29][30]. In this study, three methods were used to determine the MMP of natural gas flooding in block B111, including using the above established PVT model to predict the IFT between natural gas and crude oil; using the PVT model to simulate the multiple contact process; and using the empirical formula of Hou [27].…”
Section: Mmp Between Injected Natural Gas and Crude Oilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMP is an important parameter to judge the miscible state between injected gas and crude oil during gas flooding. Many methods can be used to determine the MMP of gas flooding, including the slim tube experiment, the interfacial tension test, EoS prediction and empirical formula calculation [25][26][27][28][29][30]. In this study, three methods were used to determine the MMP of natural gas flooding in block B111, including using the above established PVT model to predict the IFT between natural gas and crude oil; using the PVT model to simulate the multiple contact process; and using the empirical formula of Hou [27].…”
Section: Mmp Between Injected Natural Gas and Crude Oilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods for predicting the MMP of CO 2 -oil systems typically involve experimental tests (Novosad et al, 1990;Nguyen et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2019), empirical modeling (Shokir, 2007;ZareNezhad, 2016), and numerical simulations (Zhao and Fang, 2020;Ge et al, 2021). Experimental techniques, such as the slim-tube experiment (Hao et al, 2020;Lu et al, 2022), rising bubble apparatus (Li and Luo, 2017), and vanishing interfacial tension tests (Safaei et al, 2023), have been widely utilized to measure the MMP under different injected gases. However, these methods are generally applied to measure the MMP of fluids in the bulk phase, rather than in nanopores (Zhang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%