2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-022-05006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel equation that incorporates the linear and hyperbolic nature of the force–velocity relationship in lower and upper limb exercises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a hybrid equation 28 ( Equation ) that combines a linear and a curvilinear (Hill‐type) region was used in the current study. Briefly, this equation includes the classical linear 29 and hyperbolic 30 equations, as well as an associated coefficient to each of the two [ c 1 ( Equation ) and c 2 ( Equation ), respectively] that provides different albeit complementary weights ( c 1 + c 2 = 1) to each of them as a function of relative intensity (i.e., in this case torque relative to maximum isometric torque) 28 normalVgoodbreak=c1[]TnormalT0Sgoodbreak+c2[]normalT0TbT+a c1goodbreak=11+e()normalkgoodbreak−normalT/T0S c2goodbreak=11+e()normalT/T0goodbreak−normalkS where V is velocity (angular velocity in this case), c 1 is the coefficient associated to the linear equation, c 2 is the coefficient associated to the hyperbolic equation, T is torque, T 0 is estimated maximum isometric torque, S is the slope of the linear region, a and b are Hill‐type constants, k is a constant that determines the point of transition from the linear to the hyperbolic equation (i.e., when c 1 and c 2 are both 0.5), and s is a constant that determines how smooth the model runs from the linear to the hyperbolic region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, a hybrid equation 28 ( Equation ) that combines a linear and a curvilinear (Hill‐type) region was used in the current study. Briefly, this equation includes the classical linear 29 and hyperbolic 30 equations, as well as an associated coefficient to each of the two [ c 1 ( Equation ) and c 2 ( Equation ), respectively] that provides different albeit complementary weights ( c 1 + c 2 = 1) to each of them as a function of relative intensity (i.e., in this case torque relative to maximum isometric torque) 28 normalVgoodbreak=c1[]TnormalT0Sgoodbreak+c2[]normalT0TbT+a c1goodbreak=11+e()normalkgoodbreak−normalT/T0S c2goodbreak=11+e()normalT/T0goodbreak−normalkS where V is velocity (angular velocity in this case), c 1 is the coefficient associated to the linear equation, c 2 is the coefficient associated to the hyperbolic equation, T is torque, T 0 is estimated maximum isometric torque, S is the slope of the linear region, a and b are Hill‐type constants, k is a constant that determines the point of transition from the linear to the hyperbolic equation (i.e., when c 1 and c 2 are both 0.5), and s is a constant that determines how smooth the model runs from the linear to the hyperbolic region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 , 26 In both multi‐joint and single‐joint muscle actions, force decreases linearly as a function of velocity in a specific limited region (from high to moderate forces), whereas force decreases as velocity increases in a curvilinear (convex) fashion in other region (from moderate to null forces). 27 Therefore, a hybrid equation 28 ( Equation 1 ) that combines a linear and a curvilinear (Hill‐type) region was used in the current study. Briefly, this equation includes the classical linear 29 and hyperbolic 30 equations, as well as an associated coefficient to each of the two [ c 1 ( Equation 2 ) and c 2 ( Equation 3 ), respectively] that provides different albeit complementary weights ( c 1 + c 2 = 1) to each of them as a function of relative intensity (i.e., in this case torque relative to maximum isometric torque).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the equation chosen to model the F-V relationship, curvilinear models seem to fit registered F-V data better than linear models. However, it has been showed that F-V data deviate from the traditional rectangular hyperbola at both ends of the relationship (Alcazar et al, 2019), and so other models have been recently proposed in the literature (Alcazar et al, 2022). Even so linear models may still be valid and helpful in some cases.…”
Section: The Assessment Of the F-v Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%