2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-022-07352-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel epsilon-dominance Harris Hawks optimizer for multi-objective optimization in engineering design problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The four-bar plane truss design problem has been widely used to evaluate and verify the engineering application potential of the algorithm [55][56][57] . This problem contains four joint points and four structural members, takes the cross-sectional area of the structural members as the design variables, and takes the synchronous minimization of the volume of the plane truss and the vertical displacement of the node as the optimization objective functions.…”
Section: Application Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four-bar plane truss design problem has been widely used to evaluate and verify the engineering application potential of the algorithm [55][56][57] . This problem contains four joint points and four structural members, takes the cross-sectional area of the structural members as the design variables, and takes the synchronous minimization of the volume of the plane truss and the vertical displacement of the node as the optimization objective functions.…”
Section: Application Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… is the set of feasible solutions, which is formed by the intersection of the constraints of the optimization problem [21] . We denote the image of the decision space by and we call it an objective space [22] . The elements of , are called objective vectors and they consist of real-valued objective functions.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If , , and negative threshold constraints do not exist, then this criterion is established and is represented by . In this paper, a five-level domination criterion is constructed by adding or reducing the constraints of partial binary relations based on the classical multi-attribute decision making theory [39]. Negative threshold constraints are added to the fourth-level and fifth-level domination criteria to prevent outranking relations with gaps that are too large from being screened out.…”
Section: Fig 2 General Framework Of the Pne-prtc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%