2019
DOI: 10.3390/electronics8060667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Electrocardiogram Biometric Identification Method Based on Temporal-Frequency Autoencoding

Abstract: For good performance, most existing electrocardiogram (ECG) identification methods still need to adopt a denoising process to remove noise interference beforehand. This specific signal preprocessing technique requires great efforts for algorithm engineering and is usually complicated and time-consuming. To more conveniently remove the influence of noise interference and realize accurate identification, a novel temporal-frequency autoencoding based method is proposed. In particular, the raw data is firstly tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous studies [11], [28], the authors used the daubechies wavelet function for filtering ECG signals. In our study, the dmey wavelet function was chosen because its shape is close to that of a heartbeat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the previous studies [11], [28], the authors used the daubechies wavelet function for filtering ECG signals. In our study, the dmey wavelet function was chosen because its shape is close to that of a heartbeat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xn is the ECG signals and m is the level of the wavelet decomposition. Moreover, the expressions for calculating the approximation d m and detail a m coefficients are expressed as follows [28]:…”
Section: A Ecg Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the ECG signal acquisition involves high-gain instrumentation amplifiers that are easily contaminated by different sources of noise, with characteristic frequency spectrums depending on the source [2]. ECG contaminants can be classified into different categories, including [2][3][4]; (i) power line interference at 60 or 50 Hz, depending on the power supply frequency; (ii) electrode contact noise of about 1 Hz, caused by improper contact between the body and electrodes; (iii) motion artifacts that produce long distortions at 100-500 ms, caused by patient's movements, affecting the electrode-skin impedance; (iv) muscle contractions, producing noise up to 10% of regular peak-to-peak ECG amplitude and frequency up to 10 kHz around 50 ms; and (v) baseline wander caused by respiratory activity at 0-0.5 Hz. All of these kinds of noise can interfere with the original ECG signal, which may cause deformations on the ECG waveforms and produce an abnormal signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To keep as much of the ECG signal as possible, the noise must be removed from the original signal to provide an accurate diagnosis. Unfortunately, the denoising process is a challenging task due to the overlap of all the noise signals at both low and high frequencies [4]. To prevent noise interference, several approaches have been proposed to denoise ECG signals based on adaptive filtering [5][6][7], wavelet methods [8,9], and empirical mode decomposition [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%