2011 International Conference on Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Technologies 2011
DOI: 10.1109/mspct.2011.6150448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel edge preserving filter for impulse noise removal

Abstract: This paper proposes an edge preserving filter for removal of impulse noise. Digital images received from various sources are often degraded due to impulse noise and thus become unsuitable for further processing. To overcome this degradation removal of impulse noise is very important. In this paper an effective and efficient method of impulse noise removal is proposed which not only removes noise but also preserves edges. The algorithm first finds noisy, noise free and edge pixels. Then it replaces the noisy pi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, some researchers realised that different kinds of 2D image features can be used for better restoring performance. Therefore, edge preserving and direction based filters gained more and more attention [11–15]. Recent years, some interpolation based denoising algorithm, such as [16, 17], also yielded significant denoising results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, some researchers realised that different kinds of 2D image features can be used for better restoring performance. Therefore, edge preserving and direction based filters gained more and more attention [11–15]. Recent years, some interpolation based denoising algorithm, such as [16, 17], also yielded significant denoising results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, as we all know, in many cases of image processing, the performance of an algorithm primarily depends on its adaptability to varying structures across an image [18]. In impulse noise removal, the methods in [11–15] took some 2D image features such as edge, gradient and direction information into account and achieved exciting experimental results. However, in impulse noise removal processing, it is difficult to effectively extract and make full use of image structure because of the absence of massive randomly located pixels. The most common way to remove impulse noise is to perform different kinds of algorithms on a sliding window to calculate the value of the centred noisy pixel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main morphological edge detection methods are morphological residual edge detection, top-hat method, ASF method [7], multi-scale method [8] and multi-grade method [9]. Salt-and-pepper impulse noise is one commonly encountered noise type during image and video communication [10].Salt and Pepper noise can be removed by Progressive Switching Median (PSM) filter [11], Extremum Median (EM) filter [12], Adaptive Median (AM) filter [13] and Weighted Median (WM) filter [14] and some other methods like those in [15,16,21,22]. Edge detection of noisy images is one of the challenging task in the field of image processing ,the literature survey shows that a number of algorithms have been proposed for this like [17] uses a separate wavelet based noise reduction block for preprocessing before edge detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%