2021
DOI: 10.1111/coin.12470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel dissimilarity metric based on feature‐to‐feature scatter frequencies for clustering‐based feature selection in biomedical data

Abstract: Filter feature selection methods have been extensively used for dimensionality reduction in biomedical data analysis. In this article, a novel dissimilarity metric based on feature‐to‐feature (F2F) scatter frequencies is proposed for clustering‐based filter feature selection. The proposed metric is computed by obtaining the feature‐level ranks of samples and identifying the features which assign close ranks to each sample. The order of ranking is determined for each feature by class labels. Samples are represe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce dimensionality, filter feature selection techniques have been extensively employed in biological data analysis. Sheikhi has proposed [20], a brand-new dissimilarity metric based on feature-to-feature (F2F) scatter frequencies is proposed for clustering-based filter feature selection. The suggested metric is calculated using sample-level ranks and a list of the characteristics that give each sample a similar rank.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce dimensionality, filter feature selection techniques have been extensively employed in biological data analysis. Sheikhi has proposed [20], a brand-new dissimilarity metric based on feature-to-feature (F2F) scatter frequencies is proposed for clustering-based filter feature selection. The suggested metric is calculated using sample-level ranks and a list of the characteristics that give each sample a similar rank.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%