2016
DOI: 10.1109/tbc.2015.2459656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Differential Detection for Differential OFDM Systems With High Mobility

Abstract: In conventional differential detection (CDD), the previous received symbol is used as the phase reference for the current received symbol, therefore the channel variation due to fast fading causes an error floor. We propose a novel iterative decision-directed differential detection (iD4) algorithm for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems employing differential PSK modulation in each subcarrier. The core of iD4 is a low complexity time and frequency 2-D estimator which can effectively estim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MFN each transmitter will therefore illuminate its own area, and its signal will not add up with the other transmitters’ signals, causing the received E MFN to be equal to the strongest contribution arriving from any of the individual transmitters, as in Equation (1). A single-frequency network, in turn, as defined in [ 4 ], is a network of synchronized transmitters radiating the same MUX in the same physical radio channel (with the center frequency f 1 in Figure 1 c). Due to the simultaneous reception from multiple transmitters, operating at the same frequency channel, an effective coverage is thus expectedly higher by a factor known as the “SFN gain”, as defined in Equation (2) and shown in Figure 1 c as a dark grey area surrounding individual coverages obtained in MFN.…”
Section: The Concept and Benefits Of The Single Frequency Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In MFN each transmitter will therefore illuminate its own area, and its signal will not add up with the other transmitters’ signals, causing the received E MFN to be equal to the strongest contribution arriving from any of the individual transmitters, as in Equation (1). A single-frequency network, in turn, as defined in [ 4 ], is a network of synchronized transmitters radiating the same MUX in the same physical radio channel (with the center frequency f 1 in Figure 1 c). Due to the simultaneous reception from multiple transmitters, operating at the same frequency channel, an effective coverage is thus expectedly higher by a factor known as the “SFN gain”, as defined in Equation (2) and shown in Figure 1 c as a dark grey area surrounding individual coverages obtained in MFN.…”
Section: The Concept and Benefits Of The Single Frequency Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some major literature contributions relating to the aforementioned topics include a study [ 3 ] in which the average SFN gain was determined to equal 1.1 dB with a standard deviation of 3.3 dB, the values obtained for an exemplary DVB-H network located in Ghent (Belgium). In [ 4 ], a decision-directed detection was proposed for compensating the channel variation of global services, thus making the global channel estimate available on the receiver side for every OFDM symbol carrying global services. Based on this proposal, in [ 5 , 6 ] the authors recommended the use of a method called “local service insertion”, which allows for the provision of local services in wide-area SFNs (an option unavailable in the original version of DAB system).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such systems, the information is embedded in the phase difference between adjacent symbols, and hence, differential encoding is needed. Although differential detection is only 3 dB worse than coherent detection in flat fading channels, its performance may deteriorate significantly in frequency-selective channels [34], [35]. Consequently, Wu and Kam [36] proposed a generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) receiver whose performance without CSI is comparable to the coherent detector.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such systems, the information is embedded in the phase difference between adjacent symbols, and hence, differential encoding is needed. Although differential detection is only 3 dB worse than coherent detection in flat fading channels, its performance may deteriorate significantly in frequency-selective channels [29], [30]. Consequently, Wu and Kam [31] proposed a generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) receiver whose performance without CSI is comparable to the coherent detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%