2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel diagnostic approach to detecting porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: The lateral immunochromatography assay

Abstract: Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) causes acute diarrhea and dehydration in sucking piglets and has a high mortality rate. An immunochromatography (IC) assay, known as a lateral flow test, is a simple device intended to detect the presence of target pathogens. Here, we developed an IC assay that detected PEDV antigens with 96.0% (218/227) sensitivity and 98.5% (262/266) specificity when compared with real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR using FAM-labeled probes based on sequences from nucleocapsid gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is necessary to definitely identify the causative pathogen using confirmatory laboratory tests, which is essential for timely clinical decision-making and management of epidemics of PED [13]. Commonly used laboratory diagnostic methods of PEDV include antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunochromatography assay (IC), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), Taq-Man-based real-time RT-PCR and nanoparticle-assisted PCR assay and so forth [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Currently, ELISA and IC have been widely applied to detect PEDV in large-scale blood or feces samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to definitely identify the causative pathogen using confirmatory laboratory tests, which is essential for timely clinical decision-making and management of epidemics of PED [13]. Commonly used laboratory diagnostic methods of PEDV include antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunochromatography assay (IC), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), Taq-Man-based real-time RT-PCR and nanoparticle-assisted PCR assay and so forth [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Currently, ELISA and IC have been widely applied to detect PEDV in large-scale blood or feces samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is of great importance to develop differential laboratory tests [9,10]. To date, several methods including RT-PCR [11], separation identification [12], serological method [13], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [14] and colloidal gold method [15][16][17] have been used to detect the PEDV antigen. Although RT-PCR serves as a good standard due to its high sensitivity and accuracy, this method relies heavily on sophisticated equipment and expensive apparatus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods currently used to diagnose PED in clinical samples are mainly divided into two types: 1) immunological methods including immunochromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [8,9], and 2) molecular biology assays including conventional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), multiplex PCR, and reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) [10][11][12][13]. Although immunological methods are generally low cost and easy to perform, they have several disadvantages, including inconclusive results and the long time required to perform the assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%