2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2010.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel device for batch-wise isolation of α-cellulose from small-amount wholewood samples

Abstract: Originally published as:Wieloch, T., Helle, G., Heinrich, I., Voigt, M., Schyma, P. (2011): A novel device for batch-wise isolation of α-cellulose from small-amount wholewood samples. AbstractA novel device for the chemical isolation of α-cellulose from wholewood material of tree rings was designed by the Potsdam Dendro Laboratory. It allows the simultaneous treatment of up to several hundred micro samples. Key features are the batch-wise exchange of the chemical solutions, the reusability of all major parts … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wholewood and α-cellulose may therefore give different low-frequency isotope signals. To increase the efficiency of extracting α-cellulose and holocellulose, various methods have been proposed (Green, 1963;Leavitt and Danzer, 1993;Loader et al, 1997;Brendel et al, 2000;Cullen and MacFarlane, 2005;Gaudinski et al, 2005;Rinne et al, 2005;Wieloch et al, 2011), all of which have one point in common: Tree rings are first separated, and each separated ring is placed in a vial for the processing of cellulose. Intense effort is required, including grinding or slicing and then chemically processing each tree-ring sample in a separate vial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wholewood and α-cellulose may therefore give different low-frequency isotope signals. To increase the efficiency of extracting α-cellulose and holocellulose, various methods have been proposed (Green, 1963;Leavitt and Danzer, 1993;Loader et al, 1997;Brendel et al, 2000;Cullen and MacFarlane, 2005;Gaudinski et al, 2005;Rinne et al, 2005;Wieloch et al, 2011), all of which have one point in common: Tree rings are first separated, and each separated ring is placed in a vial for the processing of cellulose. Intense effort is required, including grinding or slicing and then chemically processing each tree-ring sample in a separate vial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each sample, 2-4 rings putatively dated from 1955 to 1985 were selected for analysis, and the wood cut from each individual ring using a scalpel (in total 25 samples from 8 different trees). Cellulose extraction for the Suriname samples was conducted in Leeds, following the batch method of Wieloch et al (2011). These samples were then sent for 14 C analysis by means of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) in Bothell, USA by DirectAMS (http:// www.directams.com).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these selected nine years ( Figure S1 in supplementary material), wood of complete rings including early and latewood was separated and cut into thin slivers under a microscope. We extracted α-cellulose from individual ring samples (i.e., not pooling rings from different trees) following a standard large batch processing procedure [46,47]. From each ring sample, 200 ± 10 µg of α-cellulose were encapsulated in silver foil for the determination of 13 C/ 12 C and 18 O/ 16 O isotopic ratios.…”
Section: Stable Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%