Tree-based diversity measures incorporate phylogenetic or phenotypic relatedness into comparisons of microbial communities. This improves the identification of explanatory factors compared to tree-agnostic diversity measures. However, applying tree-based diversity measures to metagenome data is more challenging than for single-locus sequencing (e.g., 16S rRNA gene). The Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) provides a genome-based reference database that can be used for species-level metagenome profiling, and a multi-locus phylogeny of all genomes that can be employed for diversity calculations. Moreover, traits can be inferred from the genomic content of each representative, allowing for trait-based diversity measures. Still, it is unclear how metagenome-based assessments of microbiome diversity benefit from incorporating phylogeny or phenotype into measures of diversity. We assessed this by measuring phylogeny-based, trait-based, and tree-agnostic diversity measures from a large, global collection of human gut metagenomes composed of 33 studies and 3348 samples. We found phylogeny- and trait-based alpha diversity to better differentiate samples by westernization, age, and gender. PCoA ordinations of phylogeny- or trait-based weighted UniFrac explained more variance than tree-agnostic measures, which was largely a result of these measures emphasizing inter-phylum differences between Bacteroidaceae (Bacteroidota) and Enterobacteriaceae (Proteobacteria) versus just differences within Bacteroidaceae (Bacteroidota). The disease state of samples was better explained by tree-based weighted UniFrac, especially the presence of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) and hypertension. Our findings show that metagenome diversity estimation benefits from incorporating a genome-derived phylogeny or traits.ImportanceEstimations of microbiome diversity are fundamental to understanding spatiotemporal changes of microbial communities and identifying which factors mediate such changes. Tree-based measures of diversity are widespread for amplicon-based microbiome studies due to their utility relative to tree-agnostic measures; however, tree-based measures are seldomly applied to shotgun metagenomics data. We evaluated the utility of phylogeny-, trait-, and tree-agnostic diversity measures on a large scale human gut metagenome dataset to help guide researchers with the complex task of evaluating microbiome diversity via metagenomics.