2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel deep learning based automatic auscultatory method to measure blood pressure

Abstract: Background: It is clinically important to develop innovative techniques that can accurately measure blood pressures (BP) automatically. Objectives: This study aimed to present and evaluate a novel automatic BP measurement method based on deep learning method, and to confirm the effects on measured BPs of the position and contact pressure of stethoscope. Methods: 30 healthy subjects were recruited. 9 BP measurements (from three different stethoscope contact pressures and three repeats) were performed on each su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrated that when compared with the reference manual auscultatory method, there was no significant difference between deep learning method and manual method under four different measurement conditions. Although we have previous reported that deep learning method could measure BPs accurately under resting condition with the measurement error of 1.4 ± 2.4 mmHg for SBP and 3.3 ± 2.9 mmHg for DBP, [9] it is important to evaluate its measurement performance under non-resting condition. In this study, the deep learning method achieved less than 1 mmHg measurement error (all SD < 4 mmHg) under both resting and non-resting condition (deeper breathing, talking and arm movement condition).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study demonstrated that when compared with the reference manual auscultatory method, there was no significant difference between deep learning method and manual method under four different measurement conditions. Although we have previous reported that deep learning method could measure BPs accurately under resting condition with the measurement error of 1.4 ± 2.4 mmHg for SBP and 3.3 ± 2.9 mmHg for DBP, [9] it is important to evaluate its measurement performance under non-resting condition. In this study, the deep learning method achieved less than 1 mmHg measurement error (all SD < 4 mmHg) under both resting and non-resting condition (deeper breathing, talking and arm movement condition).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A deep learning method using convolutional neural networks (CNN) to identify the audible Korotkoff sound (KorS) has been developed in our previous publication [9]. As shown in Figure 1, after the audible KorS and non-audible KorS beats were identified by the trained CNN, the cuff pressures that corresponded to the first and last audible KorS beats were used to determine automatic SBP and DBP.…”
Section: Bp Measurement Using Deep Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, deep learning methods have been successfully utilized for post-stroke pneumonia prediction [2] . Deep CNNs have also been used for segmentation and classification of mammograms [3] and measurement of blood pressure [4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%