2020
DOI: 10.18280/ts.370622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Convolutional Neural Network Based Model for Recognition and Classification of Apple Leaf Diseases

Abstract: Plants have a great role to play in biodiversity sustenance. These natural products not only push their demand for agricultural productivity, but also for the manufacturing of medical products, cosmetics and many more. Apple is one of the fruits that is known for its excellent nutritional properties and is therefore recommended for daily intake. However, due to various diseases in apple plants, farmers have to suffer from a huge loss. This not only causes severe effects on fruit’s health, but also decreases it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, a number of plant disease recognition experiments are carried on two diseased leaf image databases of apple, namely, YangLing and Kaggle, and compared with Plant leaf disease recognition using SVM and PHOG Descriptor (SVMPHOG; Zhang and Sha, 2013 ), Plant leaf disease recognition using K-means-based segmentation and neural networks (KSNN; Bashish et al, 2011 ), Plant leaf disease recognition using image recognition technology (IRT; Qin et al, 2016 ), AlexNet ( Jg et al, 2021 ), LeNet5 ( Qi et al, 2021 ), VGG-16 ( Dhaka et al, 2021 ), and CNN ( Yadav et al, 2020 ). SVMPHOG, KSNN, and IRT are three feature extraction-based methods, where each leaf image is firstly segmented and their recognition rates rely heavily on the image segmented and feature extraction.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, a number of plant disease recognition experiments are carried on two diseased leaf image databases of apple, namely, YangLing and Kaggle, and compared with Plant leaf disease recognition using SVM and PHOG Descriptor (SVMPHOG; Zhang and Sha, 2013 ), Plant leaf disease recognition using K-means-based segmentation and neural networks (KSNN; Bashish et al, 2011 ), Plant leaf disease recognition using image recognition technology (IRT; Qin et al, 2016 ), AlexNet ( Jg et al, 2021 ), LeNet5 ( Qi et al, 2021 ), VGG-16 ( Dhaka et al, 2021 ), and CNN ( Yadav et al, 2020 ). SVMPHOG, KSNN, and IRT are three feature extraction-based methods, where each leaf image is firstly segmented and their recognition rates rely heavily on the image segmented and feature extraction.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AlexNet, LeNet5, VGG-16, and CNN are four kinds of widely used models. The parameters of the pre-training network in the constructed MCNN are set as: the number of training iterations 3,000, the number of samples processed per time Bsize = 128, weight decay is 0.0005, momentum is 0.9, and the initial learning rate is 0.001, which is reduced to half of the original value every 1,000 steps ( Yadav et al, 2020 ), and Adam is as optimizer ( Kingma and Ba, 2017 ). To verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, the image recognition accuracy and average processing time per image are used to evaluate the algorithm.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, it is important to quickly identify the wood knot defects in a short time [1][2][3][4]. Although the traditional manual recognition is widely used and accurate, it is still a subjective [5] and inefficient method to identify wood knot defects [6]. With the rapid development of digital image processing and computer vision, artificial intelligence technology can improve the recognition speed and accuracy at a certain extent [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is important to identify the defects of wood knots in a short time. Although manual recognition is accurate, it takes a lot of time to train the staff, and the recognition speed on the assembly line is very slow compared to machine recognition [4,5]. With the development of artificial intelligence and computer vision technology, deep learning has potential significance in the application of wood knot defect classification [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%