2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2018.8451500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Confidence Measure for Disparity Maps by Pixel-Wise Cost Function Analysis

Abstract: Disparity estimation algorithms mostly lack information about the reliability of the disparities. Therefore, errors in initial disparity maps are propagated in consecutive processing steps. This is in particularly problematic for difficult scene elements, e.g., periodic structures. Consequently, we introduce a simple, yet novel confidence measure that filters out wrongly computed disparities, resulting in improved final disparity maps. To demonstrate the benefit of this approach, we compare our method with exi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods developed algorithms based on the minimum cost and local properties of the cost profile (Egnal, Mintz, and Wildes 2004;Haeusler, Nair, and Kondermann 2013;Haeusler and Klette 2012;Wedel et al 2009;Kim, Yoo, and Kim 2014;Kim, Jang, and Kim 2016). Some conventional methods examine the entire curve of the cost profile to extract useful informa-tion for measuring confidence (Haeusler, Nair, and Kondermann 2013;Matthies 1992;Scharstein and Szeliski 1996;Het Veld et al 2018). Unlike these methods that concentrate on the cost profile inside the stereo-matching model, the proposed approach examines the disparity profile outside the stereo-matching network, making it suitable for learningbased end-to-end stereo-matching methods.…”
Section: Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods developed algorithms based on the minimum cost and local properties of the cost profile (Egnal, Mintz, and Wildes 2004;Haeusler, Nair, and Kondermann 2013;Haeusler and Klette 2012;Wedel et al 2009;Kim, Yoo, and Kim 2014;Kim, Jang, and Kim 2016). Some conventional methods examine the entire curve of the cost profile to extract useful informa-tion for measuring confidence (Haeusler, Nair, and Kondermann 2013;Matthies 1992;Scharstein and Szeliski 1996;Het Veld et al 2018). Unlike these methods that concentrate on the cost profile inside the stereo-matching model, the proposed approach examines the disparity profile outside the stereo-matching network, making it suitable for learningbased end-to-end stereo-matching methods.…”
Section: Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties of matching cost curve (Egnal et al, 2004;Hirschmüller et al, 2002;Veld et al, 2018;Zhang and Shan, 2001) 1. Rich information and characteristics could be extracted from the cost curves.…”
Section: Metric Strengths Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 99%