2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12182-020-00493-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel complex network-based deep learning method for characterizing gas–liquid two-phase flow

Abstract: Gas-liquid two-phase flow widely exits in production and transportation of petroleum industry. Characterizing gas-liquid flow and measuring flow parameters represent challenges of great importance, which contribute to the recognition of flow regime and the optimal design of industrial equipment. In this paper, we propose a novel complex network-based deep learning method for characterizing gas-liquid flow. Firstly, we map the multichannel measurements to multiple limited penetrable visibility graphs (LPVGs) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using graph files as inputs, Gao et al classified samples by flow structure via convolutional neural networks. 88 Two convolutional neural networks were used to classify 6 flow structures and void fraction (Fig. 9a).…”
Section: Machine Learning For Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using graph files as inputs, Gao et al classified samples by flow structure via convolutional neural networks. 88 Two convolutional neural networks were used to classify 6 flow structures and void fraction (Fig. 9a).…”
Section: Machine Learning For Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhongke Gao et al [12] designed a branch-aggregation network (BAN) for classifying flow patterns in gas-liquid two-phase flow images, achieving a fast convergence speed and a recognition accuracy of 99.60%, highlighting its advantage in noise resistance. Zhong-Ke Gao et al [13] proposed a deep learning method based on complex networks that combined the original signals of limited penetrable visibility graphs (LPVG) with images for flow pattern classification and gas void fraction measurement. Their results showed a classification accuracy of 95.3% and an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0038, with an average absolute percentage error of 6.3% for gas void fraction measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study is to eliminate or weaken the slug flow and provide a stable flow pattern for gasliquid two-phase measurements while increasing the stability of the instrument operation. Based on the principle of kinetic energy conversion and turbulent diffusion [21], a new slug flow elimination method is put forward to change the distribution pattern of gas and liquid phases [22]. This method can effectively reduce the slug flow frequency and achieve the purpose of weakening or eliminating the slug flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%