2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel comparison of Møller and Compton electron-beam polarimeters

Abstract: We have performed a novel comparison between electron-beam polarimeters based on Møller and Compton scattering. A sequence of electron-beam polarization measurements were performed at low beam currents (< 5 µA) during the Q weak experiment in Hall C at Jefferson Lab. These low current measurements were bracketed by the regular high current (180 µA) operation of the Compton polarimeter. All measurements were found to be consistent within experimental uncertainties of 1% or less, demonstrating that electron pola… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and periodically with dedicated measurements using a Møller polarimeter [18]. Both were found to agree [19] during the experiment and yielded a combined polarization of P = 88.80 ± 0.55%.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…and periodically with dedicated measurements using a Møller polarimeter [18]. Both were found to agree [19] during the experiment and yielded a combined polarization of P = 88.80 ± 0.55%.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Together with the known polarization of the polarimeter targets, the beam polarization can thus be extracted. Taking CEBAF at Jefferson Lab, for instance, there are three types of electron beam polarimeter which are Mott [453], Møller [454], and Compton [455], respectively, providing polarization measurements as precise as 1% at different positions along the beamline. The Compton polarimeter uses a highly polarized and high power laser as the scattering target which is noninvasive to the electron beam so that it can continuously monitor the beam polarization.…”
Section: Luminosity and Polarization Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A test was performed during which both polarimeters made measurements, one right after the other, at the same beam current (≈4.5 µA) in order to verify that both devices gave the same result under the same beam conditions. 114 The results yielded good agreement within the respective uncertainties of the devices, although in this case the Compton polarimeter had a rather large statistical uncertainty (0.71%) due to operation at low beam current. An additional result of this test was that, when compared to nearby Compton measurements at high beam currents, the polarization was shown to not depend on beam current (at the 1% level) over a current range of 175 µA.…”
Section: Møller-compton Comparison At Jlab Hall Cmentioning
confidence: 54%