2012
DOI: 10.1115/1.4006343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Comparison of Design-by-Analysis Methods

Abstract: There exist some atypical loads on pressure vessels during transportation. This is particularly true when the pressure vessel weighs over 500 tonnes. In this example vessel, the transportation was via rail on a “Schnabel car,” in which the vessel is suspended horizontally between the top nozzle and the skirt, and a significant axial compressive load is applied. During the evaluation of the stresses in the top head, a particularly novel situation was encountered which brought about some interesting issues with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The elastic design-by-analysis codes and standards with the relatively large safety factors are thought of as a conservative criteria. However, it has been reported in [19] that the elastic rules failed to predict the failure due to non-standard loading on a pressure vessel, which could only be successfully predicted by the nonlinear elastoplastic analysis. The ductile material failure mechanism is essentially inelastic and nonlinear, while the elastic design codes are evolved from a linear, single-strength concept that does not account for the plastic deformation or its growth history [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elastic design-by-analysis codes and standards with the relatively large safety factors are thought of as a conservative criteria. However, it has been reported in [19] that the elastic rules failed to predict the failure due to non-standard loading on a pressure vessel, which could only be successfully predicted by the nonlinear elastoplastic analysis. The ductile material failure mechanism is essentially inelastic and nonlinear, while the elastic design codes are evolved from a linear, single-strength concept that does not account for the plastic deformation or its growth history [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os métodos de análise do Projeto por Análise são comparados em [20], para vasos de pressão, porém para a situação de transporte do componente. O componente é simulado com cargas de suportes horizontais e análises elásticas, limites e elasto-plásticas são realizadas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified