2011
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Bioreactor for the Dynamic Stimulation and Mechanical Evaluation of Multiple Tissue-Engineered Constructs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic culture, replacing the traditional static culture, has become a new trend in bone tissue engineering [15]. However, the existing bioreactors for tissue engineering applications still have some problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic culture, replacing the traditional static culture, has become a new trend in bone tissue engineering [15]. However, the existing bioreactors for tissue engineering applications still have some problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, only three indirect compression systems have been developed, which utilize noncontact magnetically driven pressure actuators. 10,35,36 However, these devices do not utilize the magnetic field as a mode of biophysical stimulation; instead, the magnetic fields are solely to actuate mechanical loading. The range of magneto-stimulation that can be applied in our system is modular and scalable, since the size and strength of the magnets can be varied without major revisions of the peripheral equipment or technology.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1939, when Glucksmann built the first mechanostimulation device, many devices have been developed to apply mechanical stimuli to cartilage explants and engineered constructs. Lujan et al 10 reported over 205 cartilage engineering articles, which applied mechanical stimulation, 29% of which had the capacity to quantify material properties. Interestingly, most of these devices are only capable of applying a single type of mechanical stimulus, including compressive loading, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] bending or tensile stress, [18][19][20][21] shear stress, [22][23][24] and hydrostatic pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range in our device is *30 · more than the Aufderheide design 10 and 7 · more than the Lujan device. 14 In mimicking extreme rates of stress change, our device is a compromise between other designs. Finally, our design implements a linear encoder that is independent of sensing elements which reduces the complexity of further device enhancements.…”
Section: Design Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 A stimulator design recently reported by Lujan et al has taken into consideration the adaptability to standard disposable tissue culture trays and demonstrated the capability to measure force on individual samples through the use of dedicated electromagnetic actuators. 14 However, due to the size of the electromagnetic actuators, they are limited to a six-well plate. This shortcoming restricts stimulation and constructs evaluation throughput.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%