Particle Swarm Optimization 2009
DOI: 10.5772/6764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Binary Coding Particle Swarm Optimization for Feeder Reconfiguration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One more advantage of the proposed method is that it guarantees fast convergence because answer space will reduce significantly. For example, in Figure 2 feasible states are equal to 60 (as already mentioned), but all states are equal to 2 16 (=65536); then answer space is about 0.09% of the search space.…”
Section: Sifting Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One more advantage of the proposed method is that it guarantees fast convergence because answer space will reduce significantly. For example, in Figure 2 feasible states are equal to 60 (as already mentioned), but all states are equal to 2 16 (=65536); then answer space is about 0.09% of the search space.…”
Section: Sifting Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It avoids the algorithm to trap in a local optimum solution. At this step just feasible codes will be checked, but in other algorithms like BPSO codes will be updated and then changed to feasible states [15,16]. This change will reduce the speed of algorithm and make it difficult too.…”
Section: Sifting Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the proposed GA is useable when it is implemented for huge network systems only and efficiently for the restoration system problem solving and load balancing study. A part from that, an improved of optimization method such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for power losses minimization has been done in [5][6][7][8]. The simulation results for this optimization method have shown a good healthiness of the approach in term of power loss reduction but they are less optimal solution for computational time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%