2018
DOI: 10.3390/en11051211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Battery State of Charge Estimation Method Based on a Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Observer

Abstract: A novel method for Li-ion battery state of charge (SOC) estimation based on a super-twisting sliding mode observer (STSMO) is proposed in this paper. To design the STSMO, the state equation of a second-order RC equivalent circuit model (SRCECM) is derived to represent the dynamic behaviors of the Li-ion battery, and the model parameters are determined by the pulse current discharge approach. The convergence of the STSMO is proven by Lyapunov stability theory. The experiments under three different discharge pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [148], the dual SMO was proposed considering the capacity fading effect for SOC estimation. To improve the efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of the SMO, some variants, such as the adaptive gain SMO (AGSMO) [149], adaptive switching gain SMO (ASGSMO) [150], super-twisting SMO (STSMO) [151], fractional order SMO (FOSMO) [152], and Fuzzy SMO (FSMO) [153], have been reported in the literature. Table 13 shows the comparison of the SMO-based SOC estimation methods.…”
Section: Sliding Mode Observer (Smo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [148], the dual SMO was proposed considering the capacity fading effect for SOC estimation. To improve the efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of the SMO, some variants, such as the adaptive gain SMO (AGSMO) [149], adaptive switching gain SMO (ASGSMO) [150], super-twisting SMO (STSMO) [151], fractional order SMO (FOSMO) [152], and Fuzzy SMO (FSMO) [153], have been reported in the literature. Table 13 shows the comparison of the SMO-based SOC estimation methods.…”
Section: Sliding Mode Observer (Smo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al 2008 [140] ME ≤ ± 3% Ning et al 2016 [143] ME ≤ ± 2% Ma et al 2016 [144] ME ≤ ± 3% Xia et al 2017 [145] ≤± 0.86% Chen et al 2013 [150] Unspecified Zhong et al 2017 [153] ≤± 1% Huangfu et al 2018 [151] ≤± 2% Chen et al 2018 [148] ≤± 1%…”
Section: Reference Mae (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IAUKF-UKF proposed in this paper ranked the two filters to turn the parameter modification on only when the voltage prediction converges to the observed value. In order to verify the reliability of the proposed algorithm, different initial values of SoC (the reference is [1]) are set in this section. The convergence performance of AUKF-UKF and IAUKF-UKF are compared under DST test.…”
Section: Comparison Of Soc Estimation and Parameter Modification Accumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate estimation of SoC can not only be used as an important basis for drivers to judge the endurance of batteries, but also for achieving equalization control, overcharge and discharge protection, overheat protection and other functions in battery management system. However, as an artificially defined variable, SoC can only be calculated by voltage, current and temperature of batteries [1]. Based on this, the methods for SoC estimation in recent years can be divided into those based on characterization parameters and definitions, data-driven and battery modeling theory [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst others, the ECMs have a better trade-off between accuracy and complexity and thus are favorable candidates for application in micro-controller units. Generally, ECMs are used to simulate the dynamics of an LIB, while the states of interest are estimated in real time with various observers, such as the Luenberger observer [20], the extended Kalman filter (EKF) [21][22][23], the square root cubature Kalman filter [24], the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) [25], the sliding mode observer (SMO) [26], the particle filter (PF) [27], and the nonlinear observer [28]. For these methods, the ECMs are calibrated offline and the model parameters are assumed to be fixed during operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%