2012
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach to standardised recording of bleeding in a high risk neonatal population

Abstract: Bleeding is common in premature and term neonates admitted to intensive/high dependency care nurseries. This novel bleeding assessment tool facilitates prospective recording of bleeding events in neonatal intensive care settings and may allow standardised bleeding assessments in this high risk population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We ascertained bleeding events during the first 96 hours after birth based on a diagnosis of or notation of abnormal bleeding in physician, nursing or respiratory therapist documentation. We also adapted the Neonatal Bleeding Assessment Tool (NeoBAT), a validated bleeding assessment tool, to retrospectively assess the severity of abnormal bleeding events 14. We used the modified NeoBAT to ascribe all patients with bleeding events a modified WHO bleeding assessment scale score (scale of 1–4, with 4 being the most severe).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We ascertained bleeding events during the first 96 hours after birth based on a diagnosis of or notation of abnormal bleeding in physician, nursing or respiratory therapist documentation. We also adapted the Neonatal Bleeding Assessment Tool (NeoBAT), a validated bleeding assessment tool, to retrospectively assess the severity of abnormal bleeding events 14. We used the modified NeoBAT to ascribe all patients with bleeding events a modified WHO bleeding assessment scale score (scale of 1–4, with 4 being the most severe).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also adapted the Neonatal Bleeding Assessment Tool (NeoBAT), a validated bleeding assessment tool, to retrospectively assess the severity of abnormal bleeding events. 14 We used the modified NeoBAT to ascribe all patients with bleeding events a modified WHO bleeding assessment scale score (scale of 1-4, with 4 being the most severe). Patients without bleeding were assigned a score of 0.…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this study, bleeding will be recorded on a specifically designed, validated bleeding assessment tool [14] and graded according to the following definitions: minor, moderate, major and severe (table 1). The platelet transfusion dose will be 15 ml/kg and will adhere to current UK specifications for apheresis platelets of a platelet cell content >240 × 10 9 per adult unit.…”
Section: Summary Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the usefulness of obtaining coagulation tests from nonbleeding preterm neonates is unclear, because the lack of appropriate reference intervals for preterm neonates obfuscates accurate interpretation of the reported values . Moreover, when coagulation tests appear to be abnormal, it is not certain whether FFP administration actually reduces the odds of a subsequent hemorrhage …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%