2012 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/scored.2012.6518646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach to skew-detection and correction of English alphabets for OCR

Abstract: Abstract-Optical Character Recognition has been a challenging field in the advent of digital computers. It is needed where information is to be readable both to humans and machines. The process of OCR is composed of a set of pre and post processing steps that decide the level of accuracy of recognition. This paper deals with one of the pre-processing steps involved in the OCR process i.e. Skew (Slant) Detection and Correction. The proposed algorithm implemented for skew-detection is termed as the COG (Centre o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which were skewed in the entire range of 0 0 to360 0 . Cinara et al [34] used the centre of gravity [43] for detecting skew angle in the document image. W. Postl [168] used Fast Fourier Transform for finding the skew angle.…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which were skewed in the entire range of 0 0 to360 0 . Cinara et al [34] used the centre of gravity [43] for detecting skew angle in the document image. W. Postl [168] used Fast Fourier Transform for finding the skew angle.…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare against two types of baselines. (i) Conventional image processing methods (Shukla et al, 2016;Pan et al, 2010;Veena M.N and Vasudev.T, 2015;Chinara et al, 2018;Vijayashree et al, 2014).…”
Section: Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Shukla et al, 2016) 72.8 (Pan et al, 2010) 78.3 (Veena M. N and Vasudev.T, 2015) 74.5 (Chinara et al, 2018) 77.1 (Vijayashree et al, 2014) 76.3 (Channa andRao, 2020) 79.2 (Akhter and Rege, 2020) 81.4 MBSR-Net 99.9…”
Section: Model Hmean%mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations