2007
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach to multi-criteria inverse planning for IMRT

Abstract: Treatment plan optimization is a multi-criteria process. Optimizing solely on one objective or on a sum of a priori weighted objectives may result in inferior treatment plans. Manually adjusting weights or constraints in a trial and error procedure is time consuming. In this paper we introduce a novel multi-criteria optimization approach to automatically optimize treatment constraints (dosevolume and maximum-dose). The algorithm tries to meet these constraints as well as possible, but in the case of conflicts … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
116
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An implementation of multi-criteria objective planning should bring even better dose distribution and bring possibility to choose between trade-offs [Breedveld et al, 2007. Additionally, the multiple target optimization in PT would benefit from a shell around PT where the dose would be minimized.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An implementation of multi-criteria objective planning should bring even better dose distribution and bring possibility to choose between trade-offs [Breedveld et al, 2007. Additionally, the multiple target optimization in PT would benefit from a shell around PT where the dose would be minimized.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One related to the beam's-eye-view concept and the other similar to the successful strategy used in [11].…”
Section: A Single-beam Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other single-beam strategy tested is similar to the strategy used in [11] and can be described as follows:…”
Section: A Single-beam Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manually finding a suitable set of dose constraints and penalty weighting factors is a tedious and time‐consuming process. The automation of this process is often tackled with computationally expensive multicriteria optimization 3 , 4 , 5 . In clinical practice, however, an automated and fast planning process is desirable to reduce the workload of the treatment personnel and enable novel adaptive treatment strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of this paper, we identify two different classes of adaptation strategies. Algorithms of the first class 5 , 9 , 10 , 13 focus on the decision‐making problem and thus aim for an optimization of the importance factors, subject to additional objectives than the actual objective function used during inverse planning. The second class of adaptation algorithms 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 aims for a fast generation of an acceptable plan by adapting the penalties of a previous nonacceptable plan heuristically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%