2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2980728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Approach to Improving Brain Image Classification Using Mutual Information-Accelerated Singular Value Decomposition

Abstract: Brain image classification is one of the most useful and widely needed processes in the medical system, and it is a highly challenging field. This paper presents a new method for selecting a significant subset of features as the input to the classifier, called mutual information-accelerated singular value decomposition (MI-ASVD). This novel algorithm is exploited to design an intelligent system for classifying MRI brain images into three classes: healthy, high-grade glioma, and low-grade glioma. The proposed s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A support vector machine (SVM) based on a radial basis kernel function is selected as the pixel classifier. In the training of the classifier, a layer of the patient with a tumor image is randomly selected, and 60 points inside and outside the tumor are taken as training samples [17].…”
Section: Mri Brain Tumor Subspace Clustering Algorithm Based On Multimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A support vector machine (SVM) based on a radial basis kernel function is selected as the pixel classifier. In the training of the classifier, a layer of the patient with a tumor image is randomly selected, and 60 points inside and outside the tumor are taken as training samples [17].…”
Section: Mri Brain Tumor Subspace Clustering Algorithm Based On Multimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows the average clustering results of the same patient training layer with different neighborhood sizes. It can be seen from the figure that the optimal neighborhood size appears between 14 and 26, and considering the clustering time and the clustering accuracy of small tumors, the neighborhood value should not be too large, so the neighborhood optimization range is 10-30 [17]. Figure 5 shows the clustering results of each training layer of 10 patients.…”
Section: Parameter Range Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 438 excluded articles consisted of 172 conference abstracts, 140 articles not utilizing machine learning, 62 not representing original research, 22 not published in the English language, 15 not investigating gliomas, 11 not utilizing MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, 9 not utilizing human subjects, and 7 duplicate articles. The remaining 697 articles underwent further review, of which 685 articles were excluded and 12 articles ( 7 18 ) investigating the use of machine learning to identify gliomas in datasets which include non-glioma images were identified for inclusion in the final analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the designed method did not minimize the brain tumor classification time. Al-Saffar ZA (2020) developed a mutual information-accelerated singular value decomposition (MI-ASVD) in Al-Saffar and Yildirim (2020) to identify the MRI brain images into various classes. However, the designed approach failed to improve the accuracy of segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%