2005
DOI: 10.1007/11566465_68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Approach to High Resolution Fetal Brain MR Imaging

Abstract: This paper describes a novel approach to forming high resolution MR images of the human fetal brain. It addresses the key problem of motion of the fetus by proposing a registration refined compounding of multiple sets of orthogonal fast 2D MRI slices, that are currently acquired for clinical studies, into a single high resolution MRI volume. A robust multi-resolution slice alignment is applied iteratively to the data to correct motion of the fetus that occurs between 2D acquisitions. This is combined with an i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The segmentation of the skull bone content is performed by graph cuts, first in a midsagittal plane and then in 3-D. MRI fetal scanning is expensive and not approved for fetuses of gestational age below 20 weeks. Due to motion of the fetus during the scan, the motion correction must be applied [39]. Finally, more constrained scanning procedure and different imaging characteristics (higher signal-to-noise ratio, no signal drop outs, and no shadowing artifacts) make these techniques difficult to extend to the ultrasound domain.…”
Section: Prior Work On Quantitative Ultrasound Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segmentation of the skull bone content is performed by graph cuts, first in a midsagittal plane and then in 3-D. MRI fetal scanning is expensive and not approved for fetuses of gestational age below 20 weeks. Due to motion of the fetus during the scan, the motion correction must be applied [39]. Finally, more constrained scanning procedure and different imaging characteristics (higher signal-to-noise ratio, no signal drop outs, and no shadowing artifacts) make these techniques difficult to extend to the ultrasound domain.…”
Section: Prior Work On Quantitative Ultrasound Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of our method over volume injection techniques [1,4] is more subtle, but still visually apparent (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Image reconstruction from multiple co-registered views can be solved by push-forward interpolation and averaging [4]: Each pixel y is injected into the reconstructed image volume at all locations x within a radius d, weighted using a truncated Gaussian-shaped kernel,…”
Section: Volume Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These images would be expected to yield incorrect results for many image processing algorithms. While there exists algorithms to correct some of these artifacts (Ahmed et al, 2003;Blumenthal et al, 2002b;Forbes et al, 2001;Greenspan et al, 2001;Kim et al, 1999;Lötjönen et al, 2004;Malandain et al, 2004;Ourselin et al, 2000;Rousseau et al, 2005;Sled et al, 1998;Ward et al, 2000), these corrections may not be adequate to achieve the expected precision of the downstream image processing to quantify brain pathology metrics. Longitudinal inconsistencies tend to result from scanner software and hardware upgrades, scanner hardware deterioration and human errors/ inconsistencies.…”
Section: Factors That Impact Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%