2017
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Approach to Assess the Three-Dimensional Anatomy of a Mitral Valve Regurgitant Jet Orifice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not depending on geometric assumptions, AROA is a robust parameter, even in non-circular or multiple regurgitation orifices. We showed that AROA exhibits a good correlation with 3D VCA, which is in line with several previous studies [ 17 , 18 ]. However, the absolute differences in the comparison methods varied between the studies, which is likely due to different measurement methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Not depending on geometric assumptions, AROA is a robust parameter, even in non-circular or multiple regurgitation orifices. We showed that AROA exhibits a good correlation with 3D VCA, which is in line with several previous studies [ 17 , 18 ]. However, the absolute differences in the comparison methods varied between the studies, which is likely due to different measurement methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This approach is considered the most reliable although it calculates MR from a difference, rather than directly on the mitral valve (MV), presenting some degree of variability 17 . The effective orifice area (EOA) 8,13,14 represents a more structural measure of MV insufficiency; this approach also presents various limitations 3 partly imputable to the difficulty of measuring the EOA directly from images of the MV orifice (MVO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it is the essential moment to carefully assess the pathoanatomy of the lesion(s) and to identify anatomic risk factors that should be avoided in tailoring the correct repair solution for each individual patient by using all means necessary. 2,3,13,17-19 This exercise, most commonly performed by the echo-boarded cardiac anesthesiologist, should not focus on the obvious lesion such as a P2 flail, but on identifying the potential secondary mechanisms that could be masked by an obvious lesion. After a thorough 2-dimensional assessment where the majority of these features can be identified, 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction with/without color flow may clarify or confirm potential subtle surgical pitfalls.…”
Section: Pathoanatomic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%