2020
DOI: 10.1002/ima.22436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach in multimodality medical image fusion using optimal shearlet and deep learning

Abstract: Multi‐modality medical image fusion (MMIF) procedures have been generally utilized in different clinical applications. MMIF can furnish an image with anatomical as well as physiological data for specialists that could advance the diagnostic procedures. Various models were proposed earlier related to MMIF though there is a need still exists to enhance the efficiency of the previous techniques. In this research, the authors proposed a novel fusion model based on optimal thresholding with deep learning concepts. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known to us that just one evaluation index could not well demonstrate the quality of fused images in quantitative assessment. Thus, for the sake of making a comprehensive evaluation for the fusion images, six popular fusion evaluation metrics are introduced in this section, namely visual information fidelity for fusion (VIFF) [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ], Q S [ 34 ], average gradient (AG) [ 20 , 35 , 36 ], correlation coefficient (CC) [ 20 , 37 , 38 ], spatial frequency (SF) [ 20 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], and Q W [ 34 , 42 ]. In terms of all the six metrics, the higher the value data of the evaluation index, the better the fusion performance will be.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known to us that just one evaluation index could not well demonstrate the quality of fused images in quantitative assessment. Thus, for the sake of making a comprehensive evaluation for the fusion images, six popular fusion evaluation metrics are introduced in this section, namely visual information fidelity for fusion (VIFF) [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ], Q S [ 34 ], average gradient (AG) [ 20 , 35 , 36 ], correlation coefficient (CC) [ 20 , 37 , 38 ], spatial frequency (SF) [ 20 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], and Q W [ 34 , 42 ]. In terms of all the six metrics, the higher the value data of the evaluation index, the better the fusion performance will be.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cope with the problem, a blob shape‐sensitive function can be formulated as λS,θx=EIj2()E[]Ij2. Here, E indicates an expected value operator. Inspired by the geometric representation of the Hessian matrix in shape description, 36,37 two line strength measures, normalℓmaxS,θ and normalℓminS,θ can be described as normalℓmaxS,θ=λ,maxS,θxκ×λS,θx, normalℓminS,θ=λ,minS,θxκ×λS,θx. Here, κ=0.7 is a positive coefficient. Subsequently, Xiao et al designed two multidirectional integration functions to suppress clutters and other structures Fmaxx=maxmax1i2L1maxS,θi0, …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, E indicates an expected value operator. Inspired by the geometric representation of the Hessian matrix in shape description, 36,37 two line strength measures, ℓ S,θ max and ℓ S,θ min can be described as…”
Section: Multi-feature Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image alignment is performed via rotating, shifting, and scaling. The performance instability to the changed data set and color distortion is considered as the important limitations during image fusion 11‐13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%