2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Approach for Prediction of Vitamin D Status Using Support Vector Regression

Abstract: BackgroundEpidemiological evidence suggests that vitamin D deficiency is linked to various chronic diseases. However direct measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration, the accepted biomarker of vitamin D status, may not be feasible in large epidemiological studies. An alternative approach is to estimate vitamin D status using a predictive model based on parameters derived from questionnaire data. In previous studies, models developed using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) have explained a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an exposure-disease approach using predicted vitamin D scores instead of biomarker measurements, we must expect random measurement error to attenuate the measure of association; however, the potential loss in precision may be recovered by the larger study sample available when using predicted vitamin D status (30) . Other studies defining prediction models of vitamin D status showed 25(OH)D concentrations to be predicted quite accurately by a range of demographic and lifestyle factors (30)(31)(32)(33) . Several studies have been published using predicted vitamin D scores when testing exposuredisease hypotheses (30,(34)(35)(36)(37) , and the method seems to be broadly accepted for an epidemiological approach in large cohort studies.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an exposure-disease approach using predicted vitamin D scores instead of biomarker measurements, we must expect random measurement error to attenuate the measure of association; however, the potential loss in precision may be recovered by the larger study sample available when using predicted vitamin D status (30) . Other studies defining prediction models of vitamin D status showed 25(OH)D concentrations to be predicted quite accurately by a range of demographic and lifestyle factors (30)(31)(32)(33) . Several studies have been published using predicted vitamin D scores when testing exposuredisease hypotheses (30,(34)(35)(36)(37) , and the method seems to be broadly accepted for an epidemiological approach in large cohort studies.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…our research, did not take into account the usual calcium intake or sun-exposed body parts (33). This research did not measure Vit-D intake within the usual diet nor the consumption of antacids or laxatives, factors directly related to serum levels or absorption of Vit-D. One of the strengths of the design is the consecutive and random selection of participants, which took into account the ses and allowed including equitably subjects belonging to low, medium, and high socioeconomic levels (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of participants to be included in the sample used to construct the multiple linear model was determined so that the relative reduction of the model predictive ability for new participants, measured by the coefficient of determination (R-squared or R 2 ), would not be more than 2.5%. Previously published predictive models had a R 2 between 0.13 and 0.42 [ 7 , 11 , 18 , 29 , 30 ]. We hypothesized that the predictive ability of the model would be at least 0.4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%