2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach for isolation of essential oil from fresh leaves of Magnolia sieboldii using microwave-assisted simultaneous distillation and extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(32 reference statements)
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the use of dichloromethane as the extraction solvent gave much higher yields. The results are consistent with the reference [31]. Based on these results, dichloromethane was identified as the optimum solvent for the extraction of the essential oil from T. chinensis var.…”
Section: Effect Of Extraction Solvent On the Yield Of Essential Oilsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, the use of dichloromethane as the extraction solvent gave much higher yields. The results are consistent with the reference [31]. Based on these results, dichloromethane was identified as the optimum solvent for the extraction of the essential oil from T. chinensis var.…”
Section: Effect Of Extraction Solvent On the Yield Of Essential Oilsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The coefficient of variation (CV) is often used to determine the reproducibility of the model [50]: the greater the CV, the higher the variation of the mean value [51]. The low coefficient of variation of 1.84% implied a high degree of precision and reliability of the experiments conducted.…”
Section: /33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional extraction methods for analyzing volatile food substances are vacuum simultaneous steam distillation solvent extraction (V-SED) [ 11 , 12 ], direct solvent extraction (DSE) [ 13 , 14 ], solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE) [ 15 ], and steam distillation under reduced pressure (DRP-LLE) [ 16 , 17 ]. However, these methods need large amounts of extraction solvents, have low recovery, and can be used only with low-fat samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%