2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13677-021-00243-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel approach for IoT tasks offloading in edge-cloud environments

Abstract: Recently, the number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices connected to the Internet has increased dramatically as well as the data produced by these devices. This would require offloading IoT tasks to release heavy computation and storage to the resource-rich nodes such as Edge Computing and Cloud Computing. Although Edge Computing is a promising enabler for latency-sensitive related issues, its deployment produces new challenges. Besides, different service architectures and offloading strategies have a differe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By considering the lowest VM utilization of any edge server in the network, the OWB approach preferred to offload the task to these servers. The fuzzy-based competitor [70] utilized four crisp input variables (i.e., task length, network demand, delay sensitivity, and VM utilization) and one FLS process. In this approach, the task could be offloaded to one of the following three server types: a local edge server, a neighboring edge server, or a cloud server.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering the lowest VM utilization of any edge server in the network, the OWB approach preferred to offload the task to these servers. The fuzzy-based competitor [70] utilized four crisp input variables (i.e., task length, network demand, delay sensitivity, and VM utilization) and one FLS process. In this approach, the task could be offloaded to one of the following three server types: a local edge server, a neighboring edge server, or a cloud server.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the topic must identify the data source to the cloud platform process and store it. Cloud platforms, such as Azure [1] and AWS [2] present guidelines regarding the topic construction. However, these guidelines do not focus on the energy efficiency of the topic nor provide unique identification of devices.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, JSON is one of the main structures used when there is no standard to follow [35,36]. Although, the JSON structure alone requires at least 7 bytes at the payload: {"":""} -without considering the sensor [1] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-hub/iot-hub-mqttsupport [2] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/designingmqtt-topics-aws-iot-core/designing-mqtt-topics-aws-iotcore.html type used. About IoT sensors, the various types of sensors require efforts to identify them.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To allow this analysis to be efficiently performed in domains with increasing flows of data, such as smart cities and transportation services, there is increasing application of cloud computing to enhance the data processing and analysis by providing on-demand use of a massive set of computing resources (Sarkar, Chatterjee, & Misra, 2018;Wan, Du, Zhao, & Yang, 2021). To strengthen the potential of cloud computing and enhance the robustness, scalability, and QoS of the applications, more recently, the edge and fog computing paradigms have been increasingly applied in IoT applications (Almutairi & Aldossary, 2021;Mondragón-Ruiz, Tenorio-Trigoso, Castillo-Cara, Caminero, & Carrión, 2021).…”
Section: Internet Of Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%