A novel approach for assessing the LOS for two‐lane intercity highways under heterogeneous traffic conditions

Abstract

Performance of two-lane intercity highways has been evaluated in terms of level of service (LOS) by different researchers. Different follower-related performance measures, namely, the number of followers (NF), percent followers (PF), follower density (FD) and the number of followers as a proportion of capacity (NFPC) are examined in the present study to define LOS. Data are collected from five sites located in different parts of India. While almost all the past studies used 3-s headway rule to identify followers suggested by US Highway Capacity Manual, a new methodology is proposed in the current study to identify the followers by analysing speed difference (SD) and the gap between two consecutive vehicles. It is observed that vehicles travel in non-following condition after a critical gap threshold value of 10 s. By using a SD limit of À4 km/h to +10 km/h and a gap value of 10 s, followers are identified across all the study sites. Thereafter, different critical gap values ranging from 1.9 s to 4.3 s are observed at the study sites beyond which the probability of not following would increase. Variation in two-way traffic volume is found to be the main contributory factor which affects the critical gap values. Among all of the performance measures, NFPC shows a strong correlation with two-way traffic volume followed by FD under heterogeneous traffic condition. Finally, different threshold values of LOS ranges for two-lane intercity highways are provided by carrying out cluster analysis with the help of NFPC and FD.

Modelling risky driving behaviour

“…Research indicates that various types of this behaviour such as speeding, complicated maneuvers, aggressive driving style, all result in increasing the risk of involvement in a crash. Overtaking decision, especially on two-lane highways, is acknowledged among these risky behaviours (Polus et al, 2000;Gray and Regan, 2005;Bar-Gera and Shinar, 2005;Farah et al, 2009;Bella, 2011;Llorca et al, 2013;Llorca et al, 2015;Boora et a., 2016).…”