2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40352-019-0085-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel application of process mapping in a criminal justice setting to examine implementation of peer support for veterans leaving incarceration

Abstract: Background Between 12,000 and 16,000 veterans leave incarceration every year, yet resources are limited for reentry support that helps veterans remain connected to VA and community health care and services after leaving incarceration. Homelessness and criminal justice recidivism may result when such follow-up and support are lacking. In order to determine where gaps exist in current reentry support efforts, we developed a novel methodological adaptation of process mapping (a visualization techniqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the developed process map provided explicit visualisation of the referral process which was further analysed in two steps. First, we examined the uncertainties in the sequence of steps within the process and/or lack of systematised steps, gaps [that is, discrepancies of what the process is intended to be and what is actually is], bottlenecks within the process that cause delays before the next step occurs and ine ciencies [unnecessarily repeated steps leading to delays] to uncover potential areas for improvement broadly similar to approach used by (28). Key themes and sub themes were also discussed by the ve researches [BO, DO, MN, KAP, TB].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the developed process map provided explicit visualisation of the referral process which was further analysed in two steps. First, we examined the uncertainties in the sequence of steps within the process and/or lack of systematised steps, gaps [that is, discrepancies of what the process is intended to be and what is actually is], bottlenecks within the process that cause delays before the next step occurs and ine ciencies [unnecessarily repeated steps leading to delays] to uncover potential areas for improvement broadly similar to approach used by (28). Key themes and sub themes were also discussed by the ve researches [BO, DO, MN, KAP, TB].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recurring theme is that existing information/knowledge needs to be systematically shared/communicated across the multiple reentry support entities. Based on this work, our aforementioned larger PIE project (Simmons et al 2017) seeks to have veteran peer support specialists, ideally with some past criminal justice system involvement of their own, serve as coordinators among the different entities (in addition to the extensive individual-level support they provide to reentry veterans with MHDs/SUDs) (Kim et al 2019). We recognize that this is but one modest step towards a systems/organizational change approach to improving reentry services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further highlight current and anticipated areas of IS inquiry, relevant implementation outcomes, pragmatic methods, and implementation strategies that may be primed to activate targeted outcomes ( Table 2 ) ( 26 ). Finally, we describe how the lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic can inform the discipline of IS to become a more nimble, rapid, and agile ( 27 ). In the sections that follow, we highlight specific selected examples in the text; however, Tables 1 , 2 provide rich and comprehensive examinations of the application of IS to COVID-19.…”
Section: Operationalizing Is For Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IS can contribute to pandemic preparedness by improving both robustness and agility of systems, drawing from contributing and relevant disciplines such as industrial engineering, business, political science, and more ( 3 , 4 , 27 ). We suggest that robust systems employ expertise and tools that are fit for purpose, while agile systems are built to be adaptable and flexible in quickly changing conditions.…”
Section: Reflecting Backward: Role Of Is In Planning For Emergency Prmentioning
confidence: 99%