2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel application of pattern recognition for accurate SNP and indel discovery from high-throughput data: Targeted resequencing of the glucocorticoid receptor co-chaperone FKBP5 in a Caucasian population

Abstract: The detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion/deletions (indels) with precision from high-throughput data remains a significant bioinformatics challenge. Accurate detection is necessary before next-generation sequencing can routinely be used in the clinic. In research, scientific advances are inhibited by gaps in data, exemplified by the underrepresented discovery of rare variants, variants in non-coding regions and indels. The continued presence of false positives and false negatives p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our FKBP5 resequencing covered an area of 160 kb on chromosome 6 and identified 657 SNPs (Supplementary Table 4, http://links.lww.com/FPC/A572), as described in detail by Pelleymounter et al [26]. The majority of the polymorphisms, including 44 indels (insertions/deletions), were located in introns, flanking regions, and untranslated regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our FKBP5 resequencing covered an area of 160 kb on chromosome 6 and identified 657 SNPs (Supplementary Table 4, http://links.lww.com/FPC/A572), as described in detail by Pelleymounter et al [26]. The majority of the polymorphisms, including 44 indels (insertions/deletions), were located in introns, flanking regions, and untranslated regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Sanger and Next Generation sequencing were used to resequence FKBP5 (primers listed in Supplementary Table 1, http://links.lww.com/FPC/A572), as described previously [26]. Sanger sequencing was used to resequence all exons, exon–intron splice junctions, and ~1000 bp of the 5′ and 3′ flanking regions using 96 DNA samples from lymphoblastoid cells generated from white American patients included in the ‘Human Variation Panel’ (HD100CAU; Coriell Institute, Camden, New Jersey, USA) [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy will improve by individually bar coding each sample and by further development of the data mining strategies. [50][51][52] The application of NGS in these experiments has allowed the discovery and characterization of missed and atypical variants (allele dropout, gene conversion, and deep intronic variants). Allele dropout is a well known cause of missed mutations 53 due to unequal amplification of heterozygote alleles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NextGENe software assigns a confidence score to each variant call on a scale from 0 to 30, which was used for further variant filtering. 50 Each bar code was mined at 4% mutant allele percentage-1003 read depth (high stringency), 4% mutant allele percentage-1003 read depth on trimmed, 76-bp long reads (medium stringency), and 3% mutant allele percentage-1003 read depth (low stringency). These three mining protocols were typically linked within NextGENe for each bar code, and several bar codes linked in series, for automatic execution.…”
Section: Data Mining Sequence Variant Call and Confirmation Of Mutamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resequencing covered a 160 kb genomic region on chromosome 6p21 that contained FKBP5 utilizing methods described previously [14]. Sanger sequencing of FKBP5 was used for validation purposes and was performed with the same DNA samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%