2011
DOI: 10.2118/124874-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Application of Closed-Fracture Acidizing

Abstract: Summary The success of acid fracturing depends on the conductivity created and retained under closure stress in addition to the length of conductive fracture. The majority of acid-fracturing treatments show a sharp decline in conductivity with increasing closure stress, with almost no significant conductivity after a short production time. As a result, many wells are refractured to restore them to the original productivity after the initial fracture. However, the success of these refracture trea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main acids are conventional acid (CA), gelled acid (GA), in situ gelled acid, self-diverting acid (SDA), surface and in situ cross-linked acid, solid acid, and organic acid (Taylor and Nasr-El-Din, 2002;Bybee 2006;Nasr-El-Din et al, 2007;Ding et al, 2010;Gomaa and Nasr-El-Din, 2010;Liu et al, 2013). The acid frac techniques are acid frac with the aforementioned single and combined acid system, such as pad-acid-fracturing (PAF), multistage alternating injection acid frac, propped acid frac, and closed fracture acidizing (CFA) (Liu and Zhao, 1998;Nelson et al, 1998;Yi et al, 2010;Pournik et al, 2011). However, acid frac of ultra-deep high temperature and high pressure (HTHP) fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs is challenged by rapid acid rock reaction rate caused by limited acid-etched fracture length, high closure stress caused by limited acid-etched fracture conductivity, and natural developed fissure caused uncontrolled acid leak off and limited dynamic hydraulic fracture (Xue et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2020;Peng et al, 2019a;Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main acids are conventional acid (CA), gelled acid (GA), in situ gelled acid, self-diverting acid (SDA), surface and in situ cross-linked acid, solid acid, and organic acid (Taylor and Nasr-El-Din, 2002;Bybee 2006;Nasr-El-Din et al, 2007;Ding et al, 2010;Gomaa and Nasr-El-Din, 2010;Liu et al, 2013). The acid frac techniques are acid frac with the aforementioned single and combined acid system, such as pad-acid-fracturing (PAF), multistage alternating injection acid frac, propped acid frac, and closed fracture acidizing (CFA) (Liu and Zhao, 1998;Nelson et al, 1998;Yi et al, 2010;Pournik et al, 2011). However, acid frac of ultra-deep high temperature and high pressure (HTHP) fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs is challenged by rapid acid rock reaction rate caused by limited acid-etched fracture length, high closure stress caused by limited acid-etched fracture conductivity, and natural developed fissure caused uncontrolled acid leak off and limited dynamic hydraulic fracture (Xue et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2020;Peng et al, 2019a;Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, solid-phase invasion, fines migration, scale formation, and water sensitivity (Chen and Dai 2005;Wu et al 2007;Buchsteiner 1993;Sadeghazad and Beiranvand 2003) can cause pollution and plugging near the wellbore which has adverse effects on oil production. Acidizing treatment is one of the most important techniques that has been utilized in attempting to remove the pollution and recover formation permeability (King 1986;Wahib et al 2010;Buijse et al 2004;Pournik et al 2011). Acidizing treatment involves an injection of acidizing solution, such as HF, HCl, or HBF 4 into the formation which can react with clay particles, carbonate, and FeS, and thus, the permeability near the wellbore is recovered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%