2009
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel and universal method for microRNA RT-qPCR data normalization

Abstract: Gene expression analysis of microRNA molecules is becoming increasingly important. In this study we assess the use of the mean expression value of all expressed microRNAs in a given sample as a normalization factor for microRNA real-time quantitative PCR data and compare its performance to the currently adopted approach. We demonstrate that the mean expression value outperforms the current normalization strategy in terms of better reduction of technical variation and more accurate appreciation of biological ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
828
2
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 908 publications
(859 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
828
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from cell lines were normalized to U44 RNA expression. miRNA expression in primary tumor samples was analysed as previously described, 33 and normalization was performed by using a set of miRNAs stably expressed in neuroblastomas. Real-time RT-PCR was performed by using the Applied Biosystems 7000 Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from cell lines were normalized to U44 RNA expression. miRNA expression in primary tumor samples was analysed as previously described, 33 and normalization was performed by using a set of miRNAs stably expressed in neuroblastomas. Real-time RT-PCR was performed by using the Applied Biosystems 7000 Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression levels of miRNAs in all groups were calculated using the comparative cycle threshold (C T ) method, whereby a lower C T value is consistent with faster detection of fluorescence and therefore higher expression, and SDS software v2.3 using automatic baseline settings and a threshold of 0.2. Samples were normalized by the mean of expressed miRNAs, as described, 27 whereby C T values ≥ 35 were considered to be below the detection level of the assay and therefore only miRNAs with a C T value o 35 were included in the analyses. The mean miRNA C T value was then calculated for each group and subtracted from each 28 where comparative C T (ΔΔC T ) is defined as the difference between ΔC T of comparison groups (eg, (ΔC T P+M) − (ΔC T P − M)).…”
Section: Assessment Of Mirna Expression In Discovery Cohort From Poolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All miRNAs with cycle threshold (Ct) values .35 were considered nonamplified or not expressed and were excluded from analysis. Mean normalization was performed by subtracting the mean sample Ct from the individual miRNA Ct values (19). Relative quantification of gene expression was determined using the comparative Ct method [2 (2DDCt) ] as previously described (20).…”
Section: Mirna Expression Profiling In Cf Bronchial Brushingsmentioning
confidence: 99%