2018
DOI: 10.1080/03091902.2019.1572237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel and low-complexity peak detection algorithm for heart rate estimation from low-amplitude photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four metrics were used to quantify the performance of the peak detection algorithms. The metrics were: (1) averaged value of beat-by-beat root mean squared error (RMSE) between the PPG’s and the reference ECG’s heart rates [ 7 , 40 ], (2) averaged RMSE of the mean heart rates between the PPG and the reference ECG [ 7 , 41 ], (3) false positive (FP) beats [ 1 , 4 , 7 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], and (4) false negative (FN) beats [ 1 , 4 , 7 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Since peak detection is a single-class classification problem, there are no true negative (TN) values to evaluate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four metrics were used to quantify the performance of the peak detection algorithms. The metrics were: (1) averaged value of beat-by-beat root mean squared error (RMSE) between the PPG’s and the reference ECG’s heart rates [ 7 , 40 ], (2) averaged RMSE of the mean heart rates between the PPG and the reference ECG [ 7 , 41 ], (3) false positive (FP) beats [ 1 , 4 , 7 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], and (4) false negative (FN) beats [ 1 , 4 , 7 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Since peak detection is a single-class classification problem, there are no true negative (TN) values to evaluate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where TP, FN and FP denote, respectively, the number of true positives (pulses correctly detected as such), the number of false negatives (un-detected pulses) and the number of false positives (false or error pulses detected as true pulses). As done in (Karlen et al 2012, Argüello and Serna 2018, Argüello-Prada 2019, time deviations within 0.03 s between beats were accepted. Both FNs and FPs were considered as erroneous detections for this study, so the failed detection rate (FDR) was defined as follows:…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of such a method is the Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) method ( Vadrevu and Manikandan, 2017 ), which has been used to decompose PPG signals into a set of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). The use of Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) has also been proposed and acceptable results have been achieved when used in the analysis of PPG signals ( Paradkar and Chowdhury, 2015 ; Ricardo Ferro et al, 2015 ; Argüello Prada and Serna Maldonado, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%