2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89639-5_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Algorithm for Automatic Brain Structure Segmentation from MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, research has been focused on automated MRI segmentation of anatomical brain structures (gray matter, GM; white matter, WM; and cerebrospinal fluid, CSF) using a variety of methods including fuzzy connectedness (16), constrained Gaussian mixture models (GMM) (17), deformable models with K‐means clustering (18), spatially constrained fuzzy kernel clustering (14), graph cuts with tissue prior models (19), and hidden Markov models (HMM) (20). In some cases, the lesion has been modeled as a reject class (21) or outliers of the normal tissue models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, research has been focused on automated MRI segmentation of anatomical brain structures (gray matter, GM; white matter, WM; and cerebrospinal fluid, CSF) using a variety of methods including fuzzy connectedness (16), constrained Gaussian mixture models (GMM) (17), deformable models with K‐means clustering (18), spatially constrained fuzzy kernel clustering (14), graph cuts with tissue prior models (19), and hidden Markov models (HMM) (20). In some cases, the lesion has been modeled as a reject class (21) or outliers of the normal tissue models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these methods use MRI signal contrast to detect abnormalities, they can be modifi ed or extended to evaluate lesion characteristics seen with ischemia or stroke [ 23,24 ] . Reviewed below are some of the different available approaches, focused on automated methods such as GMMs [ 25 ] , MRFs [ 26 ] , normalized graph cut [ 27 ] , and K-means clustering [ 28 ] for the detection of brain abnormalities. Although many of these methods have considerable similarities and are sometimes indistinguishable, we describe them separately.…”
Section: Current Computational Approaches For Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some instances, after CGMM based initial tissue segmentation, deformable models along with K-means clustering have been used to improve MRI tissue classifi cation within the brain so as to generate a tissue type atlas [ 28 ] . In these heavily model driven approaches, lesions of a known shape can be readily identifi ed if the lesion encompasses an entire brain region (e.g., putamen) but this approach does not work when the lesions cross anatomical boundaries, as is the case in the majority of stroke patients.…”
Section: K-means Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%